Conrad ():
Do you plan to make a publicly-usable version of this wiki available,
perhaps
on the feather development system?
Yes, that is our next TODO item. We'll notify the list once something is set up.
// Carl
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #58034]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58034
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc=
It was revision 28928 that introduced this difference between the for
statement and statement-modifying for. I'm not sure exactly what issue
it intended to fix, but if I undo that revision everything works
according to my (not necessarily correct) expectations.
$ svn log -r28928
Reini,
I would argue that we take a different approach with 'make reconfig'.
We need to get rid of it entirely. In Parrot years, it's ancient code:
$ svn blame config/gen/makefiles/root.in | grep -n -A 3 reconfig
...
--
708: 4916 boemmels @echo reconfig: 'clean' and redo
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #58004]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58004
- Likely depends on junction dispatcher
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #57970]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57970
- C code in Perl6Str.pmc needs refactoring and updating
Since this was a bug, I felt I should move on it before this week's
release. In r30279 I applied a modified version of the patch submitted
earlier: I added $conf-cc_clean() at one location.
I then trimmed the list of configuration steps to end at
auto::attributes and reconfigured. An 'ls' on
# New Ticket Created by mhelix
# Please include the string: [perl #58030]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58030
Passing PMCs as named arguments fails when the called sub accepts optional
positional
The first named parameter isn't set if optional parameters are missing. The
function Parrot_process_args didn't
save the value of the argument. I used memcpy to copy the UnionVal. If there's
a neater way to do that please
fix my fix :) .
It only adds a couple of lines to src/inter_call.c.
# New Ticket Created by James Keenan
# Please include the string: [perl #58036]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58036
This is the same problem for which I submitted a patch yesterday with
respect to
Applied in r30280.
# New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Please include the string: [perl #58014]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58014
- Need to determine if Parrot will support NaN/Inf directly, or if
Rakudo
James Keenan via RT schrieb:
Reini,
I would argue that we take a different approach with 'make reconfig'.
We need to get rid of it entirely. In Parrot years, it's ancient code:
$ svn blame config/gen/makefiles/root.in | grep -n -A 3 reconfig
...
--
708: 4916 boemmels @echo reconfig:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 15:36:42 Bob Rogers wrote:
This test (t/pmc/namespace.t:65) seems to cause an unbounded
memory-gobbling loop on my configuration (GNU/Linux/x86). It only
happens rarely ( 1 in 35 so far), though it eats my machine when it
does . . .
I take that back;
I notice that docs/project/release_manager_guide.pod says (line 123):
It is not necessary to quiet all the codingstd tests for a
release.
Since these tests are on make test (and hence visible to
non-developers), and are being tested with Smolder in any case, I think
this
On Sunday 17 August 2008 09:29:14 Bob Rogers wrote:
I notice that docs/project/release_manager_guide.pod says (line 123):
It is not necessary to quiet all the codingstd tests for a
release.
Since these tests are on make test (and hence visible to
non-developers), and are
From: chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:39:05 -0700
Not all of the codingstd tests are part of make test. There's a specific
codingstd test target you can run separately. I estimate about 2/3 of the
tests will pass. The others may or may not ever pass. For
chromatic schrieb:
On Saturday 16 August 2008 15:36:42 Bob Rogers wrote:
This test (t/pmc/namespace.t:65) seems to cause an unbounded
memory-gobbling loop on my configuration (GNU/Linux/x86). It only
happens rarely ( 1 in 35 so far), though it eats my machine when it
does . . .
I
# New Ticket Created by Reini Urban
# Please include the string: [perl #58040]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58040
---
osname= cygwin
osvers= 1.5.25(0.15642)
arch= cygwin-thread-multi-64int
cc=
James Keenan (via RT) wrote:
We appear to have a coding standard which limits us to 32 characters
in a file's basename. This particular test file has 33 characters.
Oh, coding standards tests, how I love thee... (To note why I've not
been bothering to run them the last couple of days, they
Author: Whiteknight
Date: Sun Aug 17 07:55:32 2008
New Revision: 30278
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
Log:
[GC] Remove mention of GC_no_trace_volatile_roots from PDD09 and
include/parrot/dod.h. The flag is not used anywhere in Parrot, and is not
documented well enough to be
I ran make fulltest in r30280 and got some test failures, which are
summarized below. I will start submitting tickets for these shortly
(with the exception of codingstd_tests, which I assume doesn't need it).
If you have some cycles to spare, fixing these before the release would
be greatly
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 15:20:08 Andrew Johnson via RT wrote:
Almost, you just missed the executable itself (-o arg). This patch
works for me.
Thanks, applied as r30282.
-- c
Carl Mäsak wrote:
Conrad ():
Do you plan to make a publicly-usable version of this wiki available,
perhaps
on the feather development system?
Yes, that is our next TODO item. We'll notify the list once something
is set up.
Excellent.
FYI, I've also referenced your work here (see the
Author: chromatic
Date: Sun Aug 17 13:26:18 2008
New Revision: 30284
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/draft/pdd08_keys.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd09_gc.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd23_exceptions.pod
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd27_multiple_dispatch.pod
Log:
[PDD] Fixed PDD linewrapping at 78 characters, per
On Sunday 17 August 2008 09:22:34 chromatic wrote:
Ah good, Christoph and I tried to track that down the other day. I'll do
my best to fix it, but I may not have reliable network access. If you
don't see a patch from me before the release, +1 to SKIP it.
Fixed in r30286.
-- c
On Sunday 17 August 2008 11:16:08 Reini Urban wrote:
Without --optimize ./parrot t/pmc/namespace_65.pir works fine.
It prints
bar
2
With --optimize ./parrot t/pmc/namespace_65.pir hangs after the 2.
Attaching the debugger to a non-debug build is too heavy for me now,
I'll try to get it
From: chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 14:49:50 -0700
On Sunday 17 August 2008 09:22:34 chromatic wrote:
Ah good, Christoph and I tried to track that down the other day. I'll do
my best to fix it, but I may not have reliable network access. If you
don't
Bob Rogers wrote:
From: chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 09:39:05 -0700
Not all of the codingstd tests are part of make test. There's a specific
codingstd test target you can run separately. I estimate about 2/3 of the
tests will pass. The others may or may
Bob Rogers wrote:
*** gmake manifest_tests
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
t/manifest/02-regenerate_file.t1 256121 8.33% 5
Failed 1/5 test scripts,
Bob Rogers wrote:
*** gmake codingstd_tests
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed
t/codingstd/c_function_docs.t1 256 11 100.00% 1
t/codingstd/fixme.t
In r30288, renamed the file by omitting '-dispatch'. Renamed two
siblings for consistency. Changed names within these 3 files. Rebuilt.
Ran 'prove' on the directory in question. All tests continue to pass.
Resolving ticket.
From: James E Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:59:54 -0400
Bob Rogers wrote:
*** gmake manifest_tests
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of
Failed
Fixed in r30283.
-- Bob
From: James E Keenan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:55:02 -0400
Yes, when one of the 'make codingstd_tests' accumulates sufficient
PASSes, we promote it to 'make test'. Those that are not yet passing
can generally be described as: Requires cage-cleaner with vast
On Fri Aug 15 17:36:24 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I have never actually written a probe before, please review
this. I can state that on Linux, it results in the same value for
$PConfig{hugefloatvalsize} as previously. Consequently, all core
tests continue to pass.
If
36 matches
Mail list logo
