Om,
Ongkos ganti kopling 250 rb, kopling set merk FCC jepang rp 650 rb + kabel
kopling 60 rb + seal kruk as sgp 90 rb
-Original Message-
From: baleno@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victory
Kirana
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 9:39 AM
To: baleno@yahoogroups.com
Hello.
This is parsing bug.
say defined $a and defined %b{$a} parsed as (say defined $a) and
defined %b{$a}
--
Bacek.
Ilya ():
look like bug (in r31017):
my $k = 'bar';
my %s;
say defined $k; # 1
say defined %s{$k}; # 0
say defined $k and defined %s{$k}; # 1 (!) must be 0
say 1 0; # 0
No, this is intended. and has very loose precedence, even looser
than the say call. The crucial statement is thus parsed
chromatic schrieb:
On Saturday 13 September 2008 15:58:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rurban
Date: Sat Sep 13 15:58:20 2008
New Revision: 31094
Modified:
branches/cygwin070patches/runtime/parrot/include/test_more.pir
Log:
adopt pdd30
---
http://www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31101 by cotto
leads to
make perl6
../../parrot.exe
/usr/src/perl/parrot/parrot-svn/runtime/parrot/library/PGE/Perl6Grammar.pbc
\
--output=src/gen_grammar.pir \
src/parser/grammar.pg src/parser/grammar-oper.pg
Reini Urban schrieb:
http://www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=31101 by cotto
leads to
make perl6 Null PMC access in get_bool()
Fixed with 31108.
Reverted src/pmc/resizablepmcarray.pmc and src/pmc/resizablestringarray.pmc
perl6 works now again, but the problem is probably elsewhere.
Recently, in November, we've had reason to clone the Rakudo Test.pm
and add an implementation (viklund++) of is_deeply, for testing
whether two arrays, pairs or hashes are deeply -- recursively --
equivalent. The method does what you'd think it does, checks the types
of its parameters and recurses
Hi,
thank you. Do we have ticket for this parsing bug?
I have serched for it, bot do not find.
2008/9/14 via RT Ilya Belikin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #58830]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
On Sun Jan 13 05:38:42 2008, coke wrote:
--
Will Coke Coleda
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:33 PM, chromatic (via RT) parrotbug-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
# New Ticket Created by chromatic
# Please include the string: [perl #49722]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence
Ilya Belikin wrote:
Hi,
look like bug (in r31017):
my $k = 'bar';
my %s;
say defined $k; # 1
say defined %s{$k}; # 0
say defined $k and defined %s{$k}; # 1 (!) must be 0
say 1 0; # 0
I replyed in ticket, but it doesn't hit mailinglist. This is bug in
parsing. say defined $k and defined
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #58846]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58846
In Rakudo r31069, matching directly against a rule containing \n
works, but matching
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 03:08:57PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Recently, in November, we've had reason to clone the Rakudo Test.pm
and add an implementation (viklund++) of is_deeply, for testing
whether two arrays, pairs or hashes are deeply -- recursively --
equivalent. The method does what
On Thu Sep 11 23:15:50 2008, cotto wrote:
On Mon Sep 08 22:54:28 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
Fixing this shouldn't be all that difficult -- in particular,
I think that src/pmc/resizablepmcarray.pmc lines 205-206 should
be changed from
- if
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 10:55 PM, chromatic via RT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 12 September 2008 19:48:30 Will Coleda wrote:
After many weeks away from tcl, I tried to do a make test today
(r31046) and found a segfault.
I can't easily generate PIR to narrow it down, because even the
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 04:17:44AM -0700, Carl Mäsak wrote:
In Rakudo r31069, matching directly against a rule containing \n
works, but matching against a rule that calls that rule doesn't:
$ cat newline-in-token.bug
grammar A {
token foo { ^ [alnum||sp]+ $ };
token sp { ' ' | \n };
}
Conrad ():
Is there something more up-to-date concerning Perl 6 best practices that
are presently-recommended (by p6l or @Larry) than the following item on the
Perl 6 wiki?
If you ask me, best practices evolve as a countering force to enough
people using less-than-ideal practices to create
Patrick ():
I think the underlying conflict must be with the built-in sp
rule and that Rakudo isn't adding new regexes properly into a
grammar.
In that case, this bug ticket has some kind of relation to #57864.
http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=57864
// Carl
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:41:42AM -0700, Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
I got impatient and committed this as r31101. I'm marking this ticket
as resolved.
According to [1], r31101 causes Rakudo to stop building with the
following error:
$ make
../../parrot
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 04:22:38PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Patrick ():
I think the underlying conflict must be with the built-in sp
rule and that Rakudo isn't adding new regexes properly into a
grammar.
In that case, this bug ticket has some kind of relation to #57864.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 04:18:44PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Conrad ():
Is there something more up-to-date concerning Perl 6 best practices that
are presently-recommended (by p6l or @Larry) than the following item on the
Perl 6 wiki?
[...]
That said, I do have one Perl 6-specific best
A invocation of Parrot::Test::run_command with an filehandle for STDOUT
as in t/native_pbc/header.t will lead to the error.
TODO:
Check for filehandle before comparing with eq to '/dev/null'
Attached patch fixes this issue for older perls.
The filehandles are stringified to the filename.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Fri Sep 05 08:26:34 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rakudo r30787 dies on multi dispatch when subset types are involved:
Yes; this ticket depends on us switching over to the new
multi-dispatcher (perl6multisub.pmc), which does handle this case. I
hope to
# from Carl Mäsak
# on Sunday 14 September 2008 07:18:
die Unrecognized directive: TMPL_$directive
if $directive ne 'VAR' | 'LOOP' | 'IF';
One is tempted to assume that this means the same as
$directive ne 'VAR' || $directive ne 'LOOP' || $directive ne 'IF',
but it doesn't.
Actually, it
Eric Wilhelm asked me to chime in here.
is_deeply() is about checking that two structures contain the same values.
This is different from checking that they're the same *things*, that they are
in fact the same object or reference.
You need both.
Reading eqv() it seems that yes, it is doing like
->
[Bug 262500] Re: Misleading SKIP button in Intrepid installer
perl6-all
-- Thread --
-- Date --
[Bug 262500] Re: Misleading SKIP button in Intrepid installer
Colin Watson
Sun, 14 Sep 2008
25 matches
Mail list logo
