On Saturday 20 September 2008 22:24:52 Chris Davaz wrote:
If it is the case that :method and :multi are incompatible, I am a bit
surprised to see that in the Rakudo src directory:
I said they're incompatible -- meant in terms of their semantics. I didn't
say they don't work together in some
Not long ago, Stephen Weeks proclaimed...
Not long ago, Allison Randal proclaimed...
Apologies if my comments on this thread and update to the exceptions PDD
weren't clear. The resume continuation should continue to live within
the exception object, not be passed as a separate argument
chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 22:24:52 Chris Davaz wrote:
If it is the case that :method and :multi are incompatible, I am a bit
surprised to see that in the Rakudo src directory:
I said they're incompatible -- meant in terms of their semantics. I didn't say
they
the problematic test is:
slurp(./t)
Unix accepts to open a directory but that leads to problem down the pipe.
This following patch, apparently innocent, should fix the problem by refusing
to open a
directory but it triggers a memory bug.
../../parrot
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #59082]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59082
Hello,
we catch bug:
my $max = 13;
cl() for 1..2; # print only \n!
cl(); # print
A better patch that stats the opened file.
That avoids possible race conditions and is faster.
thx to jonathan and NotFound for pointing the shortcomings of the previous
patch.
# now the test pass
ok 3 - slurp() on directories fails
--- ./src/io/io_unix.c.orig 2008-09-19 17:56:19.0
Sex, 2008-09-19 às 10:25 -0700, Jon Lang escreveu:
Daniel Ruoso wrote:
In SMOP, it is handled based on the package of the Class, the private
storage inside the object is something like
$obj.^!private_storageA::$!bar
and
$ojb.^!private_storageB::$!bar
Note that this ought only be
On Fri Sep 12 10:06:01 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
src/library.c (and others?) refer to .past files, which are no longer
used. remove all references to this filetype from the parrot repo.
~jerry
This one should be closeable as of r31284. I tried acking through all
instances of the string
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #59118]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59118
Rakudo r31286 doesn't seem to recognize class attributes with the '!' twigil.
$
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #59112]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59112
In Parrot r31286:
$ perl t/examples/library.t
1..4
ok 1 -
# New Ticket Created by Carl Mäsak
# Please include the string: [perl #59120]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59120
Rakudo r31286 does not like class attributes within roles.
$ ./perl6 -e 'role A { my
Author: tene
Date: Sun Sep 21 01:47:14 2008
New Revision: 31294
Modified:
trunk/docs/pdds/pdd19_pir.pod
Changes in other areas also in this revision:
Modified:
trunk/compilers/bcg/t/BCG.t
trunk/compilers/pct/src/PAST/Compiler.pir
trunk/compilers/pct/src/PCT/HLLCompiler.pir
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #59104]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59104
Hi,
I compile parrot r31282 and November do not export sub from modules on
pir (in
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:05:34PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 22:24:52 Chris Davaz wrote:
If it is the case that :method and :multi are incompatible, I am a bit
surprised to see that in the Rakudo src directory:
I said they're incompatible -- meant in terms of
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:45:30PM -0700, Ilya Belikin wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Ilya Belikin
# Please include the string: [perl #59104]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=59104
Hi,
I compile
Patrick,
Any thoughts on why I am getting the No applicable methods error as
described in the head of this thread?
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Patrick R. Michaud [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 11:05:34PM -0700, chromatic wrote:
On Saturday 20 September 2008 22:24:52
On Sunday 21 September 2008 03:53:31 Jonathan Worthington wrote:
I said they're incompatible -- meant in terms of their semantics. I
didn't say they don't work together in some cases with our current
implementation. (They probably shouldn't.)
They probably should. If they didn't, then
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 12:46:53PM +0800, Chris Davaz wrote:
In any-str.pir we need to figure out how to change
.sub 'split' :method :multi('String')
into
.sub 'split' :method :multi(_, 'String')
[...]
... let's back up a bit and look at what is really happening.
[...] Any when we change
On Sunday 21 September 2008 03:17:18 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- branches/pdd27mmd/src/multidispatch.c (original)
+++ branches/pdd27mmd/src/multidispatch.c Sun Sep 21 03:17:16 2008
@@ -599,6 +592,7 @@
#endif
Parrot_pcc_invoke_sub_from_sig_object(interp, sub,
Index: docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod
===
--- docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod (revision 22303)
+++ docs/tutorial/ch06_objects.pod (revision 22304)
@@ -48,11 +47,25 @@
...
}
+And an embedded class:
+
+ class
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 03:34:50PM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Andrew ():
It turns out that .perl method does not escape
dollars
Have you thought about reporting this via [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's already there as RT #59068.
It would help if someone could
How does Parrot tell which parameters are the invocants? PDD27 mentions
that parameters can be decorated with :invocant, but that doesn't seem to be
used anywhere.
I'll also note that if :multi and :method don't go together then some of the
language in PDD27 needs to change. For instance, The
On Sunday 21 September 2008 14:00:59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
add delete_keyed_int to resizableintegerarray
--- trunk/src/pmc/resizableintegerarray.pmc (original)
+++ trunk/src/pmc/resizableintegerarray.pmc Sun Sep 21 14:00:58 2008
@@ -206,6 +206,24 @@
Allison Randal wrote:
The new Parrot mailing list (replacing perl6-internals/parrot-porters)
is [EMAIL PROTECTED]. If you were subscribed to the old
list, you're now subscribed to the new list.
That doesn't seem to have worked out quite right. I sent a mail today to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and
+=item Cvoid delete_keyed_int(INTVAL key)
+
+Removes the element at Ckey.
+
+=cut
+
+*/
+
+VTABLE void delete_keyed_int(INTVAL key) {
+INTVAL size = PMC_int_val(SELF);
With the use of the set_integer_native entry later, this should probably be:
INTVAL size =
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 04:12:26AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT wrote:
On Tue Sep 16 08:56:29 2008, cognominal wrote:
It prints 0\n instead of the expected i\n
Fixed this in 31227, and values, and also cleaned up kv. They are now
multis that we use !EXPORT on (kv had been written
According to the test suite (t/spec/S29-array/kv.t), the .kv
method is defined on arrays to produce an interleaved list
of indices and values:
my @array = a b c d;
say @array.kv.perl; # [ 0, a, 1, b, 2, c, 3, d ]
The kv.t file also shows a functional form of kv():
my @array = a
I'm pondering what the proper syntax is for a subroutine parameter with both a
trait and a default. That is...
sub foo ($arg = 42)
and
sub foo ($arg is readonly)
together in one parameter. Would that be
sub foo ($arg = 42 is readonly)
or
sub foo ($arg is
28 matches
Mail list logo
