> On 26 Mar 2016, at 14:44, Carl Mäsak (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
> # Please include the string: [perl #127789]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127789 >
>
>
> m: enum Sto
# New Ticket Created by "Carl Mäsak"
# Please include the string: [perl #127789]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=127789 >
m: enum Stone «:None<.> :Vertical :Horizontal
:Neutral»; my %h = Stone.enums.invert; say
Fixed with 1d12563b6c2cb39 , tests needed
> On 24 Mar 2016, at 21:40, Alex Jakimenko (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko
> # Please include the string: [perl #12]
> # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
> # https://rt.perl.org/Tick
Also fixed by f220a5edc0694751 , which makes combinations() coerce its
arguments to Int
Tests are still needed
> On 24 Mar 2016, at 21:57, Alex Jakimenko (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Alex Jakimenko
> # Please include the string: [perl #127779]
> # in the subject line of al
unit sub ???
I thought that unit was only supposed to be followed by a package like
declaration??
> On 26 Mar 2016, at 02:10, Trey Harris (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Trey Harris
> # Please include the string: [perl #127785]
> # in the subject line of all future correspon
unit sub ???
I thought that unit was only supposed to be followed by a package like
declaration??
> On 26 Mar 2016, at 02:10, Trey Harris (via RT)
> wrote:
>
> # New Ticket Created by Trey Harris
> # Please include the string: [perl #127785]
> # in the subject line of all future correspon
