[perl #128758] Reduce with numeric ops does not numify things if only one arg is passed ([*] set(1,2,3))

2017-06-29 Thread Sam S. via RT
It looks like this bug hasn't been *completely* fixed: dd &infix:<+>( "2" ); # 2 dd &infix:<*>( "2" ); # 2 dd [*] "2"; # 2 dd [+] "2"; # 2 dd reduce &infix:<*>, "2"; # 2 dd reduce &infix:<+>, "2"; # "2" i.e. it doesn't work w

[perl #131676] doing a role fails to find inherited methods in some cases

2017-06-29 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #131676] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=131676 > Mu provides iterator method, but when you mix in a role that wants it implemented, it doe

[perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:13:07 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote: > > Shouldn’t: > > > > sub ($ is rw) { } > > > > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign > > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in t

[perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 03:13:07 -0700, c...@zoffix.com wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote: > > Shouldn’t: > > > > sub ($ is rw) { } > > > > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign > > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in t

[perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote: > Shouldn’t: > > sub ($ is rw) { } > > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is > rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side. > Fe

[perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:45:02 -0700, elizabeth wrote: > Shouldn’t: > > sub ($ is rw) { } > > be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign > to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is > rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side. > Fe

Re: not enough memory

2017-06-29 Thread Gabor Szabo
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Lloyd Fournier wrote: > I'm not sure if it's related but I've been getting a few weird memory > related issues with HEAD and zef. e.g my travis build just segfaulted: > > https://travis-ci.org/spitsh/spitsh/builds/248242106#L1355 > > And a day or so ago I got: > >

Re: not enough memory

2017-06-29 Thread Lloyd Fournier
I'm not sure if it's related but I've been getting a few weird memory related issues with HEAD and zef. e.g my travis build just segfaulted: https://travis-ci.org/spitsh/spitsh/builds/248242106#L1355 And a day or so ago I got: "MoarVM panic: Heap corruption detected: pointer 0x7f0fe9a16410 to pa

Re: [perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
Shouldn’t: sub ($ is rw) { } be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side. > On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:05, Zoffix Znet (via RT) > wrote: > > # N

Re: [perl #131673] `is rw` on anon parameter causes "inconsistent bind result" error

2017-06-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
Shouldn’t: sub ($ is rw) { } be a compile-time error? I mean, there is no way to actually assign to the anonymous variable, is there? So there is no point in the “is rw”. So most likely indicates a typo on the user side. > On 29 Jun 2017, at 01:05, Zoffix Znet (via RT) > wrote: > > # N

Re: Version of a Module

2017-06-29 Thread Martin Barth
yap, when mi6 updates your META6.json this makes sense to me as well. This leads me to another question Can zef/perl6 handle differend modules version based on the suffix ':ve<0.0.1>' or based on the META6.json. I mean, could there be 2 scripts each using a different version of my module witho