? Or a combination of
the two?
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
timers to
make room; dunno if this applies to TPF, I know MacPorts got rejected solely
on that basis though.
Sorry, I didn't mean to stir this all up again. I retract my query in hopes it
will stanch the impending meta-discussions.
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com
comments that have been posted over the past year but
weren't approved because we (I?) let the comment approval queue run away from
us. We need to not let that happen again.
Maybe now I can look at why RSS feed isn't working.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.techworklove.com
release schedule works.
Thanks to everyone.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.techworklove.com = AIM:petdance
/
perl6.vim? This will combine all the Perl-related vim support files
in one place:
ftplugin/perl6.vim
indent/perl.vim
indent/perl6.vim
syntax/perl.vim
syntax/perl6.vim
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.theworkinggeek.com = AIM:petdance
On Jul 29, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson wrote:
Sure.
Thanks. It'll be nice to have everything going through one funnel.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.theworkinggeek.com = AIM:petdance
#64080'
+ok %ha !=== %ha[0], 'hoa does not refer to hash element';
+}
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.theworkinggeek.com = AIM:petdance
On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:25 PM, Kyle Hasselbacher wrote:
If they're causing a problem, I'll (1) be very surprised, and (2)
discontinue them.
That's fine. I just have never heard discussions of them. Thanks for
generating them.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com
, but culturally, they're very
similar.
Keeping Perl 5 and Perl 6 groups together also means that we will
increase cross-pollination of Perl 6 onto the Perl 5 people.
Thanks for listening,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
http://git.rakudo.org now redirects to the Github project home.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
for that.
Thanks very much to Ross Kendall for his help in setting up the
Drupal. We're building to usefully critical mass.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
done things where we shove
things on to our master branches willy-nilly, the fork queue will be
MUCH smaller, and Patrick will have a much easier time of things.
Sound reasonable? I'll go throw it on a how to be a rakudo
developer page.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com
0240f7776a9a01443567dfeaa98bba91b734affd
END_OF_RT
I'm sorry this is poorly researched. I'm heading out for the day, or
I'd have spent more time on it. I'm just concerned that using patches
is very anti-git and will make things worse.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com
Rakudo has a test suite. It also pulls in the spec test suite.
If I work on some tests (as one might expect), where should I put
them? What are the criteria for what goes where?
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:27 AM, Carl Mäsak wrote:
How about .trim(:start) and .trim(:end)?
And .trim(:both) for orthogonality.
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFJZmdob0mzA2gRTpkRAqidAJ9bG6olYr+HZZosOG75BiM77SWEoQCeLxns
5jxJ3qOuWNDlfqiwSxmIm8k=
=7VJE
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Purdue-pm mailing list
purdue...@pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/purdue-pm
--
Andy Lester
On Jan 8, 2009, at 3:11 PM, chromatic wrote:
I can't read the word Purdue without thinking Year of the Purdue
Wonder
Chicken -- but try working that into Perl 6 advocacy.
Except that's Perdue.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
and to splint,
and who knows what other compiler that might come along. They also
help document the expected API.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
This patch
http://www.parrotvm.org/svn/parrot/revision?rev=34423
is not a long-term solution. The headerizer has to get run at will.
Infinoid, can you tell me more about those ifdefs so I can make the
headerizer happy?
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com
up with a solution for that somehow. For now, your
#ifdefs are getting removed by the headerizer in the commit I'm about
to make, so you'll have to live with the compiler warnings, which
shouldn't be too odious, I hope?
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = a...@petdance.com = www.petdance.com
On Dec 5, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Simon Cozens wrote:
I just ran this code, which worked with the expected results:
Beautiful. Posted to Perlbuzz.
http://perlbuzz.com/2008/12/database-access-in-perl-6-is-coming-along-nicely.html
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
on my to-do list to fix.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
? (I
don't
want to go through the trouble of installing a local MT just to check
that. :-)
No, I'm not current.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
to see.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
milestones.
Branches that don't merge back to trunk regularly are out of touch
with the rest of development.
Length of a branch increases technical debt of merging exponentially.
xoox,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
, that I can handle.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Jun 9, 2008, at 7:13 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Andy: Is this still the case?
I don't know. I haven't done anything in parrot for months. Sorry.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On May 12, 2008, at 3:11 AM, NotFound wrote:
Maybe the solution is to avoid the problem, that is, put the
declarations outside of the HEADERIZER block. What's the point of
having static functions inside one?
So that declaration and definition are always in sync.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL
, but the header file. The typedef is
not visible in a header file.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
changes continue to exist.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
this won't happen again.
If you hate the headerizer, then kill it, and take care of the problem
yourself. You're welcome.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
message.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
I've just built the 5/2/2008 snapshot of GCC 4.4 and Parrot builds
fine on it. I wonder what new warning flags 4.4 has that I can exploit.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On May 5, 2008, at 8:52 AM, Will Coleda wrote:
This presupposes that the summaries are a good thing: anyone have any
feedback on this point?
Just wondering who the audience would be.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
technology
brings is this much closer to Rakudo being reality.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
gotten back up to speed on them
yet. I'll re-double my efforts there.
And on rakudo.org. I see no problem with replication of posts between
the two.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Apr 20, 2008, at 2:37 PM, Mark Glines wrote:
Failure to do so
results in an incompatible pointer warning, just like any other kind
of prototype mismatch.
And that in my mind is equivalent to can't.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
tell how someone in the future is going
to implement it. Perhaps the counting of elements in the array will
require fetching of elements into the array, because of lazy
calculation.
If there was a way we could have consted vtable arguments, rest assured
I'd have found it.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy
On Apr 2, 2008, at 11:12 AM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
IIRC, there's not really a conference hotel for IIT.
The dorms.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
as null that shouldn't be, then the compiler will choke
on them because that null-checking is optimized away.
Can you give details about which tests are failing?
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
, it will be an invaluable help. I
understand that right now it breaks stuff, but I'm looking at long-
term seat belts.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Mar 12, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
Also, we're planning a hackathon the weekend before YAPC::NA, June
14-15, for core hacking, language implementation, and cage cleaning.
Excellent. Where? On the IIT campus?
xao
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
with it. The PARROT_ASSERT_POINTER() idea gives
me the willies because of checking for hardcoded magic values.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
we are indeed doing. Usually. I
guess we COULD just make mem_sys_allocate() re-malloc if it gets the
magic 0xdeadbeef. Hmmm.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Mar 11, 2008, at 8:08 PM, Bob Rogers wrote:
0xdeadbeef is odd, so it doesn't even have word alignment on
byte-addressable machines. So you don't even have to check on most
architectures. True?
The word most frightens me.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
encounter difficulties using GCC 4.3, please do not contact me
directly. Instead, please visit http://gcc.gnu.org for information
about getting help.
As always, a vast number of people contributed to this GCC releases --
far too many to thank individually!
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mar 6, 2008, at 2:53 AM, chromatic wrote:
Better as:
current[len - 1]
Whitespace is nice.
Don't run ack '\w-1\]' or you might cry.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
like a net loss to me.
Actually, it was to decrease the scope of stack variables.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
.)
Well, they should have exit point, ideally. We should also have 100%
code coverage, too. And I should be a much better dancer.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
in 0 blocks.
==1234==still reachable: 4,084,824 bytes in 3,960 blocks.
==1234== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==1234== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory.
Segmentation fault
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
to real pages of interesting info.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
Anyone out there using Eclipse? I figure there might be value in its
ability to handle large codebases all at once.
Any pointers for startup and using the existing parrot project?
xoxo,
andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
Although i can remove this function, I'm not really clear on how to
update
the header file symreg.h w.r.t the headerizer stuff.
(can i just remove the prototype , or is this generated?)
You run make headerizer and it updates the header.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
On Feb 22, 2008, at 9:38 PM, chromatic wrote:
Alas! It is once again failing as of r25999.
Did it work at r25997? I think Andy keeps reverting the fix.
What is the fix we're talking about?
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Feb 18, 2008, at 11:04 AM, James E Keenan wrote:
I suspect a 'make realclean' should fix this.
or make distclean, which is even more thorough than realclean.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Feb 16, 2008, at 10:29 PM, chromatic wrote:
-chunk = list-first = chunk-next ? chunk-next : list-last;
Urgh, I missed that list-first in the middle. My bad.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
to install xcode)
The command-line tool creates text output too.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
I see that Allison's going to be at Frozen Perl. Will you be
hackathonning? Anyone else going to be there besides me?
I'm not sure I'll be sticking around for the hackathon, especially if
I don't hear from anyone, so give me a reason to stay!
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED
string_equal() is misnamed. It should be string_compare() like
strcmp() and memcmp().
Objections?
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
There's now a make target to show all the functions that are
PARROT_MALLOC: make malloclist
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
PMC). Do we need a separate header for Windows?
No, I'll take care of it. I like this kinda stuff.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:04 AM, Francois PERRAD wrote:
I agree with you, 'ld' is not a good name for a public function.
It's bigger than that. We need to not be making visible a function to
figure out log base 2.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
with another name somewhere.
Do we have guidelines for knowing what should be PARROT_API and what
shouldn't?
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
a teeny performance hit since snprintf() has to
check how far it's gone, but I can't imagine it's big enough to offset
the safety.
Thoughts?
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
on through to
sprintf() than to have a parallel implementation. Ignoring the length
parameter leaves those platforms without snprintf() exactly where they
are today.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:21 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
SymReg * r = _get_sym_typed(hsh, name, t);
if (r) {
free(name);
return r;
}
It's really saying If I don't need a copy, then free what I assume
is a copy, rather than If I need a copy
compilers/imcc/reg_alloc_bc.c looks like it's an abort project, no?
Can we get rid of it?
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
goodbye!
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
While we're at it, how about the horror of delete_ins() being told
whether it should be freeing its argument?
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
, I'll make one.
I'm working on reversing this RIGHT NOW. It also lets me const more
stuff. :-)
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
go.
I've also added some other flags that I've had in my personal config.
They're going to add some warnings at first, but give me some time to
weed out the noise.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
reason,
so I went acking for it, and look, it's unused anywhere.
Can we safely yank anything that's just not referred anywhere?
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
Any reason not to write:
PMC *result = PMC_IS_NULL(lex_pad) ? NULL : VTABLE...;
This assignment seems like a simple case, and you get a nice const
opportunity
for free.
No reason in my book, but I got a general anti-ternary vibe in the
past from the p2 crew.
--
Andy Lester
it?
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
I hacked the headerizer to do double duty as a lister of everything
marked PARROT_API in the main C source files. It skips the PMCs. The
make target is make apilist.
It's crude, but ought to make it easy to skim for things that
shouldn't be marked PARROT_API.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy
FWIW, running under valgrind gives:
uniqua:~/parrot $ valgrind ./parrot segfault.pir
==19577== Memcheck, a memory error detector.
==19577== Copyright (C) 2002-2007, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et
al.
==19577== Using LibVEX rev 1804, a library for dynamic binary
translation.
==19577==
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:16 AM, chromatic wrote:
Did you test this with make testC and make testj?
I'm unaware of testC and testj. So no.
I'm looking at the Makefile, and I guess I'm not understanding the
differences between the various cores.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED
!' 21 |
perl -p -e's/^==\d+==//'
Dropping the leading process number leaves pure stack trace goodness,
suitable for diffing between runs.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Jan 19, 2008, at 10:59 PM, James Keenan via RT wrote:
Occurs on Darwin as well: r25026.
This should be OK now. I fixed the prototype.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
http://www.rakudo.org/
Right now it's just a blog, but we can add more more more.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
a chmod +x, or we have to
modify the description a bit, it's still a big leap of usability.
But I leave it in your hands, of course.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
is exciting to a much larger
audience. It is a huge step forward.
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
this tells a better story than a list of bullet points. In
fact, we ought to have some narrative atop every release of Parrot
from here on out. I'll volunteer to do so if nobody else will when
those releases come around.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
. It's
trivial to set up a list via Google Groups, for example.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
means nothing to them.
Great; thanks. But is this the only thing we want to mention in
such a
narrative?
Not at all. It's just the one that I see as most important and am
most familiar with.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
. pbc_to_exe
means nothing to them.
So you're talking about what goes into the file NEWS. Sure, that can
be terse. I just want to make sure that there's the narrative in the
email announcements that are sent out and blog entries posted.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
just knows a bit of Perl.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
to the compiler being
used, anyway.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
that are known and being
worked on.
Thanks,
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
to
RT tickets.
xoxo,
Andy
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
at the same time?
Yes, that's correct. PARROT_API means it's something that we can link
to in a lib, and PARROT_INLINE means that the compiler can inline it.
Those two are mutually exclusive.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
for Perl 6 / Parrot news for those that
want to follow, and I don't want to keep posting progress stuff in the
main Perlbuzz column.
If I created http://perlbuzz.com/perl6andparrotprojectupdates or
something similar, do you think there'd be enough to fill the pipe?
xoa
--
Andy Lester
this thread to sleep for the requested time. */
COND_INIT(condition);
MUTEX_INIT(lock);
LOCK(lock);
time_struct-tv_sec = (time_t) timer_end; Uniniitalized
time_struct-tv_nsec = (long)((timer_end - time_struct-
tv_sec)*1000.0f) *1000L*1000L;
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Jan 1, 2008, at 8:38 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
struct timespec *time_struct;
This is a pointer to an unallocated structure, which was filled
thereafter.
Of course. I understand the C. It was the intent I couldn't get into.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com
What about when you want to implement things like, element -1 gets
the last element of the array? That's the case in some languages, I
believe...
Yes, but we're talking about returning the number of elements in a
PMC. That should never be negative.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED
Should we be allowing negative in the PMC elements() functions? Seems
to me they'd be more appropriate as UINTVALs.
xoa
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
?
At this point, it's in a todo list in seatbelts.pod.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
On Dec 21, 2007, at 10:50 AM, Jeff Horwitz wrote:
This just went up in my blog, but I think it's interesting enough to
post to the list as well.
URL? I'll post it to Mechanix.
--
Andy Lester = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = www.petdance.com = AIM:petdance
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
