dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
You're still hoping for a new, good Star Trek series??? You must be
a Cubs fan.
- Michael G. Schwern
Note: Proposing to put this *above* repeat/while / repeat/until.
https://gist.github.com/dha/0a0736b9da74a8e61e49
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
A feature is often a bug with seniority.- Chip Salzenberg
the problem is the original
> code is a bit overly-contrived (I'm thinking ;-). It shows better the
> variation after each call, maybe. my 2.00e-02 dollars worth.
So, how about this
perl6 -e 'sub a {state @x; @x.push(++$)}; say a for 1..6;'
[1]
[1 2]
[1 2 3]
[1 2 3 4]
[1 2 3
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 04:42:27PM -0400, Parrot Raiser wrote:
> On 9/16/15, David H. Adler <d...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > So, how about this
> >
> > perl6 -e 'sub a {state @x; @x.push(++$)}; say a for 1..6;'
> >
> > [1]
> > [1 2]
> >
Maybe a bit long, but think it explains it in a way people will
understand. Thoughts?
https://gist.github.com/dha/8009c28d7bf2d1ca8875
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
I think the scale of relative badness is broken in this place.
- Diablo
, is less visually complicated and gets the point
across more directly.
[1 1 1 1]
next
[1 1 1 1 1 1]
next
[1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1]
How strongly do people feel about this?
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@pobox.com> - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Damn, if this doesn't win me "Pedant of the Year
Well, the thing with C is more of a question...
https://gist.github.com/dha/02f1f41b5f8937c0271e
And for C some suggested documentation I'd like to get some extra
eyes on before I commit.
https://gist.github.com/dha/d8ab9b8cf852d358bfaf
Thanks!
dha
--
David H. Adler - <d...@panix.
like that in
the coming days.
dha
--
David H. Adler - d...@panix.com - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Your point being... - Homer Simpson
these are reasons Perl 6 is actually useful would be very helpful.
dha
--
David H. Adler - d...@panix.com - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
When I went to open my suitcase I found a lock on it, which I never
have. So I picked the lock, opened up the suitcase, and started pulling
out all these dresses. After like
that Rakudo* seems to think that the subroutine should expect *0*
arguments.
So... clearly there's a problem here, but I'm not sure if it's with
Rakudo* or with my thinking. :-)
Any thoughts on this matter would be appreciated.
many thanks,
dha
--
David H. Adler - d...@panix.com - http://www.panix.com
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:14:28PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM, David H. Adler d...@panix.com wrote:
Given the code:
? ? ? ?use v6;
? ? ? ?sub speakhash (*%hash) {
? ? ? ? ? ?say %hash{};
? ? ? ?}
? ? ? ?speakhash(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
I get
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:49:52PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:36 PM, David H. Adler d...@panix.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 03:14:28PM -0400, Will Coleda wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:03 PM, David H. Adler d...@panix.com wrote:
Given the code
On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:22:31AM -0700, jerry gay wrote:
On 7/5/06, via RT David H. Adler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As bugs go, not a killer, but still...
The problem tests are as follows:
not ok 329 - POD test for /Users/dha/parrot-0.4.5/src/ops/experimental.ops
# Failed test (t
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 09:45:31PM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
Here's an example of why I'm not real excited about CPANTS:
http://community.livejournal.com/perl/120747.html
You mean the fact that there's a perl community on LJ? :-)
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Nothing makes me appreciate Perl more than malloc.
- Andy Lester
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 04:14:01PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 01:02:00AM -0500, Andy Lester wrote:
I'm approaching the end of this release cycle. I really want to get
this released.
Tests pass. One not numeric warning:
Of course, I forgot to mention: Perl
)
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Dir-ty deeds...DONE TO SHEEP!
Heh heh...AC/DC, eat yer heart out.
- Mary Roth
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Alaska is a large cold place with approximately six residents who
would inbreed if they found each other more attractive.
- Scott Adams
.
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Just Install Perl. - Chris Nandor
architecture specific directories like that.
As mentioned elsehwere, perldoc -l is your friend.
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
... nononono. And to use nonononono just to negate that is, uhm,
confusing. Someone might think I'm stuttering.
- Abigail
released a new Acme::Test::Buffy, with slightly
improved documentation and spelling too - but no one cares about that)
Says who?
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
What kind of marathon crack binge would cause you believe this?
- Mark Rogaski
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 09:22:05PM -0700, Steve Fink wrote:
Anything I'm missing?
I feel obliged to suggest putting HQ9PLUS into the languages directory.
:-)
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
It must be difficult being such a visionary.
Not really. You
version - hq9+42
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
however, if people don't like Perl, they don't have to use it. they
can stay at the office solving their problems while the Perl Mongers
go out and drink. ;)- brian d foy in c.l.p.misc
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
implementation.
Sadly
Thanks to schwern, a couple of glitches in my interpreter have (I think)
been fixed. updated version now replacing old version at
http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/hq9p.pasm
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Perl Porters, Inc. today announced the release
I'm sure it needs a few tweaks, but I've managed to write a hq9+
interpreter in pasm.
[insert deity here] help us all. :-)
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.thetasigma.com/parrot/
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
It's all eggs, bacon, beans and a fried
On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 01:37:23AM -0500, Me wrote:
Larry's MMV on that ;-)
Man I really need to get up to speed with these
acronyms. I know YMMV, is MMV a distant
cousin perhaps?
Same idea, except it's Larry's Milage in question, rather than Yours.
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL
. Perl is ... John Cage?
Would that mean that perl 6 corresponds to 4'33"? (If I have the composers
right...)
You do, but surely it's been longer than that since we've heard
anything... :-)
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
tastes filling! less
NY.pm meeting.
In the latter case, please only do so if schwern is in town and we can
shove you and him into a different room...
dha, 1/2 :-)
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
You get the idea that if Apple won a 90% market share, bought out
Microsoft, and hired
to being a bit sentimental about chop, but I can't think of
any exciting reasons to keep it. The parity reasoning, however
strikes me as a bad idea/precedent.
dha
--
David H. Adler - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.panix.com/~dha/
Just Install Perl. - Chris Nandor
30 matches
Mail list logo
