Sean O'Rourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> Is there a better way to locate the next entry, either by an integer idx
>> or by a key or some other means?
> It's constant time if you keep a bucket index and a pointer to the
> current hash bucket in the i
On Sat, 5 Jul 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> This is a first attempt to iterate over hashes.
> The hash is scanned linearly, until the given integer index is found.
>
> Is there a better way to locate the next entry, either by an integer idx
> or by a key or some other means?
It's constant time i
This is a first attempt to iterate over hashes.
The hash is scanned linearly, until the given integer index is found.
Is there a better way to locate the next entry, either by an integer idx
or by a key or some other means?
leo
