> Echoing all compiler flags clutters the screen too much, so that
> warnings easily can get missed.
> Earlier I used to run "make -s" which silents "make".
> Still better would be:
> - echo compiler flags once
> - echo filenames only
> - let the work depending on "-s" was given to "make" or not or
[ Please answer inline, to keep the ocntext]
Josh Wilmes wrote:
I don't like the current state of things- it seems to be printing out the
full compilation commands occasionally, but mostly not.
Its probably a thing of "like it" or "not like it". I prefer to see
warnings and minimal or no compilat
Josh Wilmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't like the current state of things- it seems to be printing out the
> full compilation commands occasionally, but mostly not.
That's because not all makefiles use cc_flags.pl
> I think that at this stage of development it's best to print out the fu
I don't like the current state of things- it seems to be printing out the
full compilation commands occasionally, but mostly not.
I think that at this stage of development it's best to print out the full
commands being executed.
--Josh
At 15:34 on 07/28/2003 +0200, Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PRO
Echoing all compiler flags clutters the screen too much, so that
warnings easily can get missed.
Earlier I used to run "make -s" which silents "make".
Still better would be:
- echo compiler flags once
- echo filenames only
- let the work depending on "-s" was given to "make" or not or such
leo