[perl #132248] Z Metaoperator bug

2017-10-09 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by upatrol # Please include the string: [perl #132248] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132248 > As per a discussion on the IRC channel, I am requesting that a regression bug be filed regard

Re: [perl #132248] Z Metaoperator bug

2017-10-09 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen via RT
> On 9 Oct 2017, at 10:38, jn...@jnthn.net via RT > wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:13:34 -0700, ipatrol6...@yahoo.com wrote: >> As per a discussion on the IRC channel, I am requesting that a >> regression bug be filed regarding the incorrect handling of variables >> referenced to packages by

Re: [perl #132248] Z Metaoperator bug

2017-10-09 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 9 Oct 2017, at 10:38, jn...@jnthn.net via RT > wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:13:34 -0700, ipatrol6...@yahoo.com wrote: >> As per a discussion on the IRC channel, I am requesting that a >> regression bug be filed regarding the incorrect handling of variables >> referenced to packages by

[perl #132248] Z Metaoperator bug

2017-10-09 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:13:34 -0700, ipatrol6...@yahoo.com wrote: > As per a discussion on the IRC channel, I am requesting that a > regression bug be filed regarding the incorrect handling of variables > referenced to packages by the Z and X meta-operators. > > The behavior over time is detailed h

[perl #132248] Z Metaoperator bug

2017-10-09 Thread jn...@jnthn.net via RT
On Sun, 08 Oct 2017 19:13:34 -0700, ipatrol6...@yahoo.com wrote: > As per a discussion on the IRC channel, I am requesting that a > regression bug be filed regarding the incorrect handling of variables > referenced to packages by the Z and X meta-operators. > > The behavior over time is detailed h