[perl #132713] Order of `is assoc` and precedence traits matter, but should it?

2018-01-12 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:02:34 -0800, comdog wrote: > I originally asked this on StackOverflow: > > https://stackoverflow.com/q/48219788/2766176 > > This fails to be right associative: > > sub infix:<↑> ( Int:D \n, Int:D \m --> Int:D ) > is assoc > is equiv(:<**>) >

[perl #132713] Order of `is assoc` and precedence traits matter, but should it?

2018-01-12 Thread Zoffix Znet via RT
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:02:34 -0800, comdog wrote: > I originally asked this on StackOverflow: > > https://stackoverflow.com/q/48219788/2766176 > > This fails to be right associative: > > sub infix:<↑> ( Int:D \n, Int:D \m --> Int:D ) > is assoc > is equiv(:<**>) >

[perl #132713] Order of `is assoc` and precedence traits matter, but should it?

2018-01-12 Thread brian d foy
# New Ticket Created by "brian d foy" # Please include the string: [perl #132713] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=132713 > I originally asked this on StackOverflow: