Done thanks, Stéphane
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 11:48:08AM -0500, Gay, Jerry wrote: > if this is accepted, please close [perl #27083], as it addresses this bug, > but i haven't yet seen it posted to the list. > > --jerry > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 2:20 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [perl #27246] [PATCH] Correct ommision > > inconfig/gen/makefiles/befun ge.in > > > > > > # New Ticket Created by [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > # Please include the string: [perl #27246] > > # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. > > # <URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=27246 > > > > > > > There was no > > PERL = ${perl} > > definition in this file (which does exist in jako.in and > > others), hence when the > > "clean" target was called, the RM_F expansion omitted the > > perl resulting in > > > > nmake befunge clean > > > > and all the dependancies > > > > nmake languages-clean > > nmake clean > > nmake realclean > > > > failing with "invalid command or filename". > > > > Lokking around, I think that BF.in is similarly wrong, but I > > am not currently > > building that, and could be mistaken . > > > > > > > > > > ************************************************************************** > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or > confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom > it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail > in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or > take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete > it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited. Thank you > for your compliance. > > >
