Re: [perl #32036] [BUG] t/pmc/signal.t fails

2004-10-19 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My machine did happen to be under a bit of a load at the time the test ran, but that doesn't seem like much of an excuse. =) The test awaits the signal do be delivered in a second or so. Under load it just may fail. t/pmc/signal...Hangup

Re: [perl #32036] [BUG] t/pmc/signal.t fails

2004-10-19 Thread Jeff Clites
On Oct 19, 2004, at 12:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Will Coleda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: t/pmc/signal...Hangup I saw that once too: looks like the test script got the signal. That's what my patch from last week was supposed to fix--I'm surprised it's still happening. We should

[perl #32036] [BUG] t/pmc/signal.t fails

2004-10-18 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #32036] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org:80/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=32036 I have a little smoke script I threw together that does a cvs checkout, config,