They are well defined at the moment, but the author's intent of the API was
to have them
mutable.
-Melvin
At 01:18 PM 2/1/2005, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Layer and layer API members may be changed at runtime. Yes, the current
> structure
> members are all stat
MrJoltCola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Layer and layer API members may be changed at runtime. Yes, the current
> structure
> members are all static, but they don't have to be.
Please note: only the layer API was changed.
> I would reverse this patch.
A xxx_layer_api seems rather const to me, co
Layer and layer API members may be changed at runtime. Yes, the current
structure
members are all static, but they don't have to be.
I would reverse this patch.
-Melvin
At 06:26 AM 1/31/2005, via RT wrote:
# New Ticket Created by François PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #34002]
# in t
François" PERRAD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All instances of ParrotIOLayerAPI could be declared as 'const' in the IO
> subsystem.
Thanks, applied.
leo
# New Ticket Created by FranÃois PERRAD
# Please include the string: [perl #34002]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# https://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=34002 >
All instances of ParrotIOLayerAPI could be declared as 'const' in the IO
subsystem
