Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2009-07-19 Thread Will Coleda
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Christoph Otto via RTparrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote: On Sun Jul 19 16:18:01 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote: Would any of the participants in this thread be able to post an update? Was the TGE refactor ever done? If not, is it still needed in light of

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2009-07-19 Thread Christoph Otto
Will Coleda wrote: On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Christoph Otto via RTparrotbug-follo...@parrotcode.org wrote: On Sun Jul 19 16:18:01 2009, jk...@verizon.net wrote: Would any of the participants in this thread be able to post an update? Was the TGE refactor ever done? If not, is it still

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:43:27AM -0700, Kevin Tew wrote: What bullet items will the TGE refactor consist of? Keeping in mind that the TGE refactor really also includes refactoring PAST and POST, we have... * better command-line arg processor, like getopts, but returning a capture Yes. *

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-08-03 Thread Kevin Tew
Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: In discussions with Allison at OSCON, I noted that we needed to reconsider the syntax slightly. We don't want TGE to have to know how to parse every language, and it may not be reasonable to expect every compiler to expose a parser. So, if we're going to allow

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-08-03 Thread Allison Randal
Kevin Tew wrote: Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: So, if we're going to allow other languages in the transform bodies, we may want a hereis or podly {{...}}, {{{...}}} syntax to delimit the transform bodies. At the moment I'm leaning towards the {{...}} form, if only because PGE is already

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-08-03 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 11:21:57AM -0600, Kevin Tew wrote: Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: In discussions with Allison at OSCON, I noted that we needed to reconsider the syntax slightly. We don't want TGE to have to know how to parse every language, and it may not be reasonable to expect

Re: [perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-08-03 Thread jerry gay
On 8/3/06, Allison Randal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin Tew wrote: Patrick R. Michaud via RT wrote: So, if we're going to allow other languages in the transform bodies, we may want a hereis or podly {{...}}, {{{...}}} syntax to delimit the transform bodies. At the moment I'm leaning

[perl #40002] TGE Refactor / Compiler Tools Object

2006-07-28 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Kevin Tew # Please include the string: [perl #40002] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=40002 What bullet items will the TGE refactor consist of? * better command-line arg