[perl #50908] [CAGE] gcc -Werror=declaration-after-statement

2008-09-25 Thread Christoph Otto via RT
On Wed Sep 24 10:47:16 2008, cotto wrote: On Mon Feb 18 18:07:43 2008, coke wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 8:39 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 15 February 2008 11:35:04 Will Coleda wrote: According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like as of gcc

[perl #50908] [CAGE] gcc -Werror=declaration-after-statement

2008-09-24 Thread Christoph Otto via RT
On Mon Feb 18 18:07:43 2008, coke wrote: On Feb 18, 2008 8:39 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 15 February 2008 11:35:04 Will Coleda wrote: According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like as of gcc 4.2.3 (but not 4.1.2), we can use the following

Re: [perl #50908] [CAGE] gcc -Werror=declaration-after-statement

2008-02-18 Thread chromatic
On Friday 15 February 2008 11:35:04 Will Coleda wrote: According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like as of gcc 4.2.3 (but not 4.1.2), we can use the following option to gcc: -Werror=declaration-after-statement To help enforce our C89 compliance by causing this

Re: [perl #50908] [CAGE] gcc -Werror=declaration-after-statement

2008-02-18 Thread Will Coleda
On Feb 18, 2008 8:39 PM, chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 15 February 2008 11:35:04 Will Coleda wrote: According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like as of gcc 4.2.3 (but not 4.1.2), we can use the following option to gcc:

[perl #50908] [CAGE] gcc -Werror=declaration-after-statement

2008-02-15 Thread via RT
# New Ticket Created by Will Coleda # Please include the string: [perl #50908] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=50908 According to http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/index.html#DIR, looks like as of gcc