PDD19 already states that there's no limit, and the note that in the
future such a limit might be introduced is also there.
So, issue is resolved.
kjs
Christoph Otto via RT wrote:
If there isn't a technical reason why this is necessary, there's no
reason to create such a limitation. If there is such a reason, just
pick something big and make the code enforce it.
The PDD should of course be kept in sync with reality, but that simply
entails a
On Tue Aug 26 18:39:55 2008, rgrjr wrote:
From: Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:46:56 -0700
From PDD19:
Identifiers don't have any limit on length at the moment, but some
sane-but-generous length limit may be imposed in the future (256
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #58374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58374
From PDD19:
Identifiers don't have any limit on length
at the moment, but some
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 7:46 AM, via RT Klaas-Jan Stol
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I think 64 chars. might be enough as well; who's using longer names than
that?)
As soon as you say 64, you're going to be getting bug reports from
people who want to use 65. This is especially true with all sorts
Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) wrote:
# New Ticket Created by Klaas-Jan Stol
# Please include the string: [perl #58374]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue.
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=58374
From PDD19:
Identifiers don't have any
From: Klaas-Jan Stol (via RT) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:46:56 -0700
From PDD19:
Identifiers don't have any limit on length at the moment, but some
sane-but-generous length limit may be imposed in the future (256
chars, 1024 chars?).
If the code already
