On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:32:13AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
This just about implements a jit for ARM. It doesn't actually do any ops in
assembler yet, except for end. It's names on the basis that it's for v3 or
This is where I give up on the
On Sat, Feb 02, 2002 at 05:40:30PM -0300, Daniel Grunblatt wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:32:13AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Either way, I found I was fighting the current jit which expects (at worst)
to be able to split a 32 bit
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:32:13AM +, Nicholas Clark wrote:
This just about implements a jit for ARM. It doesn't actually do any ops in
assembler yet, except for end. It's names on the basis that it's for v3 or
This is where I give up on the current format.
Others are welcome to carry on
This just about implements a jit for ARM. It doesn't actually do any ops in
assembler yet, except for end. It's names on the basis that it's for v3 or
later instructions. (I may have all the names slightly wonky, but IIRC v3
is ARM600 and later cores. StrongARM and ARM8 are v4, but the machine
