Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 5:16 PM -0700 2/26/04, Luke Palmer wrote:
And how do we deal with an object already in existence when the base
object gets an attribute added?
After that, we post a notification to all child classes and walk through
the PMC pools inserting the new attribute in the proper
At 5:16 PM -0700 2/26/04, Luke Palmer wrote:
Dan Sugalski writes:
At 2:38 PM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Simplifies compilers:
newclass P1, Foo
addattribute P1, i
findclass I1, Foo
new P2, I1
classoffset I2, P2
In static cases, where P2 is known to be a
Leopold Toetsch writes:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2 right now.
At 8:10 AM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2
At 2:38 PM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:10 AM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
*Please* don't. Cclassoffset (and attribute access) should by all
means start with 0.
Why?
Simplifies compilers:
newclass P1, Foo
addattribute P1, i
At 10:03 AM -0500 2/26/04, Simon Glover wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 2:38 PM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:10 AM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
\No, it won't. No code should ever assume an absolute offset.
Dan Sugalski writes:
At 2:38 PM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Simplifies compilers:
newclass P1, Foo
addattribute P1, i
findclass I1, Foo
new P2, I1
classoffset I2, P2
In static cases, where P2 is known to be a CFoo, attrib #0 (i) would
be always 0. That
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:03 AM -0500 2/26/04, Simon Glover wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
like t/pmc/objects.t?
I was waiting for you to pull that out. :) Yes, objects.t assumes
some evil low-level knowledge of the internals.
Well, in
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 2:38 PM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:10 AM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
*Please* don't. Cclassoffset (and attribute access) should by all
means start with 0.
Why?
Simplifies
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 8:10 AM +0100 2/26/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
*Please* don't. Cclassoffset (and attribute access) should by all
means start with 0.
Why?
Simplifies compilers:
newclass P1, Foo
addattribute P1, i
findclass I1, Foo
new P2, I1
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
newclass P1, Foo
addattribute P1, i
find_type I0, Foo
new P2, I0
classoffset I1, P2, Foo
print I1
print \n
end
Simon
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2 right now. (Attributes 0
and 1 are taken by other things so they're valid)
--
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2 right now. (Attributes 0
and 1 are taken
At 6:42 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:54 PM -0500 2/25/04, Simon Glover wrote:
If I'm understanding the docs correctly, this should print '0'.
Instead, it prints 'Array index out of bounds!'
Another bug, though the offset ought to be 2 right now. (Attributes 0
and 1 are taken by other
15 matches
Mail list logo
