Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-05 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 4:38 PM -0500 11/4/04, Matt Diephouse wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about that. It's not that big a deal... In the past week, Parrot has seen

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-04 Thread Matt Diephouse
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about that. It's not that big a deal... In the past week, Parrot has seen a dramatic speedup. We're in about the best shape we've been in in the past 4 months:

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-04 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 4:38 PM -0500 11/4/04, Matt Diephouse wrote: On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about that. It's not that big a deal... In the past week, Parrot has seen a dramatic speedup. We're in about the

RE: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-03 Thread Garrett Goebel
Dan Sugalski wrote: Piers Cawley wrote: Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to cause some major disruptions.

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-03 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Sugalski wrote: Piers Cawley wrote: Release candidate? What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about that. It's not that big a deal... Weren't you the one calling them big changes? Tagging CVS can be helpful before committing

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-02 Thread Piers Cawley
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to cause some major disruptions. Please tag cvs before checking this in.

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-02 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 6:32 PM + 11/2/04, Piers Cawley wrote: Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to cause some major disruptions.

Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-01 Thread Dan Sugalski
At least for now? Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to cause some major disruptions. (This'll probably touch the packfile stuff too, which ought to be fun...) -- Dan

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-01 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At least for now? Yep. A minute ago the last patch WRT indirect register addressing changes went in. What's still missing is now some optimization for reusing discarded chunks. But that's mostly restricted to register.c. ... Because I need to get strings

Re: Are we done with big changes?

2004-11-01 Thread Jeff Clites
On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote: Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to cause some major disruptions. Please tag cvs before checking this in. Thanks, JEff