Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 4:38 PM -0500 11/4/04, Matt Diephouse wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about
that. It's not that big a deal...
In the past week, Parrot has seen
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about
that. It's not that big a deal...
In the past week, Parrot has seen a dramatic speedup. We're in about
the best shape we've been in in the past 4 months:
At 4:38 PM -0500 11/4/04, Matt Diephouse wrote:
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:35:09 -0500, Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about
that. It's not that big a deal...
In the past week, Parrot has seen a dramatic speedup. We're in about
the
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be
implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to
cause some major disruptions.
Garrett Goebel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan Sugalski wrote:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Release candidate?
What, think this warrants a 0.1.2 release? I'm not so sure about that.
It's not that big a deal...
Weren't you the one calling them big changes?
Tagging CVS can be helpful before committing
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be
implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to
cause some major disruptions.
Please tag cvs before checking this in.
At 6:32 PM + 11/2/04, Piers Cawley wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be
implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to
cause some major disruptions.
At least for now? Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm
going to be implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is
going to cause some major disruptions. (This'll probably touch the
packfile stuff too, which ought to be fun...)
--
Dan
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least for now?
Yep. A minute ago the last patch WRT indirect register addressing
changes went in. What's still missing is now some optimization for
reusing discarded chunks. But that's mostly restricted to register.c.
... Because I need to get strings
On Nov 1, 2004, at 6:14 AM, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Because I need to get strings working right, so I'm going to be
implementing the encoding/charset library stuff, which is going to
cause some major disruptions.
Please tag cvs before checking this in.
Thanks,
JEff
10 matches
Mail list logo