Re: Jit on Solaris: using dis instead of objdump?

2002-01-31 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, Jason Gloudon wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:27:18PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: objdump. Is anyone with a Solaris system familiar enough with jit internals to have a go at adapting it to use dis instead of GNU objdump? The difference was pretty minimal. It should

Re: Jit on Solaris: using dis instead of objdump?

2002-01-31 Thread Jason Gloudon
This should make solaris 'as' happy. There will be an assembler warning, but it's harmless. diff -r1.3 sun4Generic.pm 78c78 return Parrot::Jit-Assemble(ld [\%o0], \%o0\njmpl \%o0, \%g0\n); --- return Parrot::Jit-Assemble(ld [\%o0], \%o0\njmpl \%o0, \%g0\nnop\n); 151c151

Jit on Solaris: using dis instead of objdump?

2002-01-30 Thread Andy Dougherty
On Solaris, it looks like JIT will now be enabled if the user has also installed GNU objdump. However, there is (often) already a disassembler in /usr/ccs/bin/dis. It's output is similar, but not identical to, objdump. Is anyone with a Solaris system familiar enough with jit internals to have

Re: Jit on Solaris: using dis instead of objdump?

2002-01-30 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 3:27 PM -0500 1/30/02, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Solaris, it looks like JIT will now be enabled if the user has also installed GNU objdump. However, there is (often) already a disassembler in /usr/ccs/bin/dis. It's output is similar, but not identical to, objdump. Is anyone with a Solaris

Re: Jit on Solaris: using dis instead of objdump?

2002-01-30 Thread Jason Gloudon
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 03:27:18PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Solaris, it looks like JIT will now be enabled if the user has also installed GNU objdump. However, there is (often) already a disassembler in /usr/ccs/bin/dis. It's output is similar, but not identical to, objdump. Is