Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-11 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, > I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally > deal with it. > I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm proposing: > .namespace [foo; bar; baz

Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-11 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 2:14 PM +0100 3/11/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally deal with it. I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'

Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-11 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, > I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally > deal with it. > I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm proposing: > .namespace [foo; bar; baz

Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-10 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 9:00 PM +0100 3/9/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: >>While I see that's necessary it's not that simple ... > Oh, sure it is. :) > Well, from what I've seen so far, you're slamming all subs into the > base namespace, so that if I have IMCC code that does: >

Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-10 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 9:00 PM +0100 3/9/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally deal with it. I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm

Re: Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-09 Thread Leopold Toetsch
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, > I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally > deal with it. > I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm proposing: > .namespace [foo; bar; baz

Namespaces in IMCC

2004-03-09 Thread Dan Sugalski
While we still need to nail down the final bits of namespace stuff, I'm running into the need for it in IMCC code, so its time to finally deal with it. I don't really care what the syntax looks like, so I'm proposing: .namespace [foo; bar; baz] as a way to set the current namespace for subs