Re: PDD status

2004-02-23 Thread Simon Glover
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Michael Scott wrote: All that metadata up front in the PDDs is a bit off-putting. I'm thinking of going through all of them and putting it at the end. Any objections? Well, I've just committed the version I posted pretty much as-is, but feel free to make any changes to

Re: PDD status

2004-02-20 Thread Tim Bunce
Did you forget to add Volunteers wanted for each of these ? Tim. On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:17:50PM -0500, Simon Glover wrote: PDD 0 (intro. to PDDs): Very, very out of date; I think it actually pre-dates Parrot PDD 1 (overview of Parrot): Not obviously out-of-date, but could

Re: PDD status

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Glover
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004, Tim Bunce wrote: Did you forget to add Volunteers wanted for each of these ? Well, I'm going to try to tackle some of it, but since I have minimal CFT at the moment, any volunteers would be very welcome. Simon

Re: PDD status

2004-02-20 Thread Simon Glover
OK, here's a rewritten version of PDD 0, which reflects my view of the role that the PDDs currently play in Parrot development. Comments welcome. Simon

PDD status

2004-02-19 Thread Simon Glover
PDD 0 (intro. to PDDs): Very, very out of date; I think it actually pre-dates Parrot PDD 1 (overview of Parrot): Not obviously out-of-date, but could use some text on IMCC and on the JIT PDD 2 (vtable functions): Needs documentation on freeze, thaw and share from somebody who