ti, 2006-01-03 kello 13:57 +, The Perl 6 Summarizer kirjoitti:
Planet Perl Six is a handy news aggregator of several Perl 6 related
sources.
http://planet6.perl.org/
I believe that is actually http://planetsix.perl.org
Thanks for the great summary!
--
wolverian [EMAIL
Piers~
On 11/30/05, The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, I hopped into a taxi (and I use the word hopped advisedly) and
repaired straightway to King's Cross and thence home to Gateshead, where
my discomfort was somewhat ameliorated by the distraction of preparing
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 16:24 +, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
...Roger Browne (whose name I keep wanting to use as a Clerihew)...
Thanks for the summaries, Piers! Here's a Clerihew for you:
Roger Browne
took his Parrot to town
Wearing an upside-down
Amber crown :)
How to
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Perl 6 perlplexities
Michele Dondi worries that the increase in complexity of some aspects of
Perl 6 is much bigger than the increase in functionality that the
complexity buys us. In particular Michele is concerned that the Perl 6
On Nov 15, 2005, at 17:24, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the fortnight ending 2005-11-13
string_bitwise_*
Leo, it seems to boil down to a choice between throwing an
exception or
simply mashing everything together and marking the 'resulting bit
mess'
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Slightly tangentially to this, Dan Sugalski blogged a couple of weeks
ago about his successes and failures with Parrot. The comments are worth
reading -- there's a fair few more or less well founded complaints about
the way the Perl 6
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2005-11-04 14:34 (+):
$_ defaulting for mutating ops
Probably I have not been clear enough about that I no longer think this
is a good idea.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_juerd_happy.html
Rejigging NCI to use the ffcall library
Nick Glencross wondered about rejigging NCI, the parrot Native Call
Interface to use the ffcall library. In fact he went so far as to offer
up a proof of concept implementation. Apparently the ffcall approach
makes it much easier to write callbacks
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:39:25PM +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2005-10-09
Hello, and welcome to the first Perl 6 Summary to be published on my
website rather than its former home at http://www.perl.com/
This week in perl6-compiler
PGE
TSa [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HaloO,
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Meanwhile, in perl6-language
\(...)
Oh look, a thread in p6l that's still going more than a fortnight later.
How unusual.
Is a long running thread considered a bad thing on this list?
Nah, it's just hard to
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 18:12:23 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Allomopherencing
Not satisfied with inventing Exceptuations, Yuval invented
Allomopherencing as well. Just don't ask me what it means because I
don't know.
It was just a bad joke on Exceptuation's expense ;-)
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Writing pack, or something like it
Michele Dondi wondered how to write pack-like functions in Perl 6,
where the first argument is a string which specifies the signature of
the rest of the function call. The proposal stumped me, but maybe
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:11:02 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17
Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So:
This week in perl6-compiler
Bootstrapping the grammar
Uri Guttman had some thoughts on
On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 09:12:32AM -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:11:02 +0100, The Perl 6 Summarizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 2004-09-17
Another week, another summary, and I'm running late. So:
This week in perl6-compiler
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Namespaces
(Am I the only person who wants to repeat Namespaces! with the same
intonation used for 'Monorail!' in the Simpsons?)
Not any more...
At 1:26 PM +0100 8/9/04, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Spilling problems
The thing about writing naive compilers for naive languages is you end
up with rather large Parrot subroutines. Dan's work project is
generating ~6000 line subs.
That was only for a program triggering degenerate
ICU outdated
Joshua Gatcomb noted that the ICU that comes with Parrot is, not to put
too fine a point on it, old and buggy. The ICU developers have suggested
that Parrot move to version 3.0. Josh proposed various ways of doing
this. Leo wants ICU out of the Parrot CVS, but Dan's
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Care to explain what those are, O great math teacher?
What's a math teacher?
It's the right^H^H^H^H^HAmerican way to say maths teacher.
You mean American and 'right' are
PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This week's summary
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Care to explain what those are, O great math teacher?
What's a math teacher?
It's the right^H^H^H^H^HAmerican way
On Thu, 29 Jul 2004, Butler, Gerald wrote:
sarcasm
Of course American and Right are synonymous! Just ask OUR WONDERFUL GOD (I
mean President) GEORGE W. BUSH. He'll tell ya'
/sarcasm
OK, gentlemen, this is both way off topic and starting to head into flame
war territory, so I suggest that
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The infinite thread
Pushing onto lazy lists continued to exercise the p6l crowd (or at
least, a subset of it). Larry said that if someone wanted to hack
surreal numbers into Perl 6.1 then that would
On 2004-07-28 at 20:55:28, Piers Cawley wrote:
What's a math teacher?
Oh, come now. You may refuse to *use* the Leftpondian short form, but
pretending not to *recognize* it is a bit much. :)
--
Mark REED| CNN Internet Technology
1 CNN Center Rm SW0831G | [EMAIL
Piers Cawley wrote:
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Care to explain what those are, O great math teacher?
What's a math teacher?
It's the right^H^H^H^H^HAmerican way to say maths teacher.
--
Brent Dax Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl and Parrot hacker
Oceania has always been
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The infinite thread
Pushing onto lazy lists continued to exercise the p6l crowd (or at
least, a subset of it). Larry said that if someone wanted to hack
surreal numbers into Perl 6.1 then that
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The infinite thread
Pushing onto lazy lists continued to exercise the p6l crowd (or at
least, a subset of it). Larry said that if someone wanted to hack
surreal numbers into Perl 6.1 then that would be cool.
Care to explain what those are, O great math
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 10:29:15AM -0700, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The infinite thread
Pushing onto lazy lists continued to exercise the p6l crowd (or at
least, a subset of it). Larry said that if someone wanted to hack
surreal numbers into
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:29:15 -0700, Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The infinite thread
Pushing onto lazy lists continued to exercise the p6l crowd (or at
least, a subset of it). Larry said that if someone wanted to hack
surreal
Brent 'Dax' Royal-Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[surreal numbers]
Care to explain what those are, O great math teacher?
Surreal Number theory was an attempt in the latter half of the
twentieth century to unify several existing sets of numbers (including
the complex numbers, generalized
--- The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so the interview was on Tuesday 13th of July.
It went well; I'm going to be a maths teacher.
As usual, we begin with maths-geometry:
In Mathematics last week, one Pythagoras suggested there might be a
relationship between the sides of
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2004-07-20 14:46 (+0100):
Another subthread discussed interpolation in strings. Larry's changed
his mind so that $file.ext is now interpreted as $object.method. You
need to do ${file}.ext or $( $file ).ext. Or maybe $«file».ext
by analogy with
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 19:15:49 +0200, Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer skribis 2004-07-20 14:46 (+0100):
Another subthread discussed interpolation in strings. Larry'schanged
his mind so that $file.ext is now interpreted as
$object.method. You
need to do ${file}.ext
Jonadab the Unsightly One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Different OO models
Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
inheriting behaviour from objects rather than classes in Perl 6.
Urgle. I've completely failed to
On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Piers Cawley wrote:
Jonadab the Unsightly One [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Different OO models
Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
inheriting behaviour from objects rather than classes
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Different OO models
Jonadab the Unsightly One had wondered about having objects
inheriting behaviour from objects rather than classes in Perl 6.
Urgle. I've completely failed to explain myself so as to be
understood. That wasn't at
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Congratulations Ion, don't forget to send in a patch to the CREDITS
file.
$ grep -1 Ion CREDITS
N: Ion Alexandru Morega
D: string.pmc
Thanks again for your summary,
leo
Please take me off your mailing list. I don't know how you got my address,
but I have no idea what you are talking about. Mrs. Yardley address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Passing arrays of structs to NCI subs
Is working in the meantime.
Separating allocation and initialization of objects
Last week, Leo posted the latest object benchmarks, and things were
fast. But there was one test where Python was
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subroutine calls
Leo announced that he's added a pmc_const opcode to parrot. The idea
being that, [ ... ]
you would instead fetch a preexisting Subroutine PMC
from the PMC constant
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subroutine calls
Leo announced that he's added a pmc_const opcode to parrot. The idea
being that, [ ... ]
you would instead fetch a preexisting Subroutine PMC
from the PMC constant pool.
Not quite. I've implemented it here
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Parrotbug reaches 0.0.1
Jerome Quelin responded to Dan's otherwise ignored request for a
parrot equivalent of perlbug when he offered an implementation of
parrotbug for everyone's perusal, but didn't go so far to add it to
the distribution. I don't think it's
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news! Bad news!
Good news! Dan says the infrastructure is in place to do delegated
method calls for vtable functions with objects. Bad news! It doesn't
actually work
That's solved already. You can override e.g. inc Px w/o
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It turned out to be a simple matter of unimplemented functions,
which he and Leo rapidly implemented.
s/he and Leo/he/
I was just the one hitting Ctrl-C Ctrl-V. (Actually, I was using the
mouse, since I was working
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20040229
Native PBC issues
It turns out that, just at the moment, Parrot bytecode isn't actually
platform independent. This will, of course, get fixed, but it's not
Leo's top priority at
On 10 Feb 2004, at 14:09, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
I wonder how long it'll be before someone reimplements
them in in PIR...
or Perl6 perchance.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Scott) writes:
On 10 Feb 2004, at 14:09, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
I wonder how long it'll be before someone reimplements
them in in PIR...
or Perl6 perchance.
Well, Perl6::Rules should be coming out soon, so that should help.
--
The problem with
At 12:03 AM +0100 1/29/04, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
At 10:40 +0100 1/28/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The costs of sharing
Leo Töposted a test program and some results for timing the difference
between using shared and unshared PMCs. ... Hopefully the
Elizabeth Mattijsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:40 +0100 1/28/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
$ time parrot shared_ref.pasm
real0m0.375s
Ah.. I want a Ponie! ;-)
Actually some bits are still missing:
- The SharedRef construction code has to ensure that the refered PMC is
shared too (~
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The costs of sharing
Leo Töposted a test program and some results for timing the difference
between using shared and unshared PMCs. ... Hopefully the benchmark will
get checked into examples/benchmarks as suggested by Luke earlier.
Done now.
$ time
At 10:40 +0100 1/28/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The costs of sharing
Leo Töposted a test program and some results for timing the difference
between using shared and unshared PMCs. ... Hopefully the benchmark will
get checked into examples/benchmarks as
At 12:36 PM -0500 1/13/04, Uri Guttman wrote:
TP6S == The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TP6S Congratulations Dan
TP6S Melvin Smith offered his congratulations to Dan for the
TP6S first commercial use of Parrot. I think I can safely say we
TP6S all echo those
TP6S == The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TP6S Congratulations Dan
TP6S Melvin Smith offered his congratulations to Dan for the
TP6S first commercial use of Parrot. I think I can safely say we
TP6S all echo those congratulations.
shouldn't that be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Scott) writes:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Austin Hastings) writes:
PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are trying to
spin up 200 years worth of amendments and supreme court decisions at the
same time, it's still a ratf*ck.
Sayeth the Summarizer:
Asked for pithy comments, chromatic gave good pith, noting that if he
'had a test case from everyone who asked When'll it be done and code
to pass a test case from everyone who said I'd like to help, but I
don't know where to start...' then he'd happily check
Uri Guttman wrote:
i say we just sell them a license to use the US constitution.
Bill Gates wrote:
What is it with these Linux guys?
i say we just sell them a license to use Windoze.
:-)
A
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Austin Hastings) writes:
PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are trying to
spin up 200 years worth of amendments and supreme court decisions at the
same time, it's still a ratf*ck. Eu need to get eurselves a Larry.
Just
On 1/5/04 1:55 PM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I confess I wouldn't be surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen
the full implementation of at least one of the big non-Perl scripting
languages on top of Parrot.
I'm confused, are
* Lars Balker Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-01-05 20:42]:
I'm confused, are you optimistic or pessimistic in that last
sentence?
Sounds carefully optimistic to me. At least it certainly doesn't
sound pessimistic per se, no?
--
Regards,
Aristotle
If you can't laugh at yourself, you don't
chromatic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 10:55, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I confess I wouldn't be
surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
implementation of at least one of the big
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I confess
I wouldn't be surprised if,
by the end of the year,
we haven't seen
the full implementation of
at least one of
the big
non-Perl
scripting languages
on top of Parrot.
Obviously you've been reading the proposed EU constitution.
-Original Message-
From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AH PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are
AH trying to spin up 200 years worth of amendments and supreme court
AH decisions at the same
According to Austin Hastings:
When you consider some of the issues, it's sort of obvious that they're
trying *real* hard not to say, Look the Americans solved this problem
already.
Three words: Second System Effect.
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
reminds me of the great line: in EU they consider a 100 miles a long
distance, in the US we consider 100 years a long time. :)
AH That's very good. I'm going to recycle it. Do you know the author?
dunno. i have heard it from several
At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
implementation of at least one of the big non-Perl
Lars Balker Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me? I think Perl 6's design 'in the large' will be pretty much
done once Apocalypse 12 and its corresponding Exegesis are
finished. Of course, the devil is in the details, but I don't
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
surprised if, by the end of the year, we haven't seen the full
At 09:30 PM 1/5/2004 +, Piers Cawley wrote:
Melvin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 07:55 PM 1/5/2004 +0100, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
people's salaries will depend on Parrot. I confess I wouldn't be
surprised if, by the end of
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Problems with make test
Harry Jackson couldn't get his build of parrot to finish running make
test. After a certain amount of thrashing about by the team, Dan
narrowed it down to issues with the mutant '2.96' version of GCC that
some versions of Red
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 05:48:04PM -0500, Austin Hastings wrote:
From: Uri Guttman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AH == Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AH PS: While I'm somewhat sympathetic to the fact that eu guys are
AH trying to spin up 200 years worth of amendments and
Thank you for a lovely Christmas Present.
Michael
On Dec 24, 2003, at 2:37 AM, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20031221
Welcome one and all to the penultimate Perl 6 Summary for 2003. The
nights are long, the air is cold, freezing fog made the journey
Michael Joyce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for a lovely Christmas Present.
Any time.
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vocabulary
If you're even vaguely interested in the workings of Perl 6's object
system, you need to read the referenced post.
Luke Palmer, worrying about people using Object related vocabulary in
subtly inconsistent ways,
Piers Cawley writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vocabulary
If you're even vaguely interested in the workings of Perl 6's object
system, you need to read the referenced post.
Luke Palmer, worrying about people using Object related vocabulary in
Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley writes:
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This should, of course, read:
http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or even:
http://groups.google.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
We
The Perl 6 Summarizer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PMC Compiler 2nd edition
... Melvin wondered if the time had come to replace the
existing ops2c and pmc2c with the newer versions. Leo thought that
pmc2c2 was definitely stable enough, but wasn't too sure about ops2c2.
On 2003-12-10 at 15:05:09, The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Oh yes, if you've not been following, ^op (ie, the vector operators)
has become op which is, if nothing else, a right swine to write
in a POD C escape.
Eh, op is just a hack for people who can't type C»op«, like ANSI C
The Perl 6 Summarizer wrote:
Do Steve Fink's debugging for him
Steve Fink had a problem with some generated code throwing a segfault
when it was run and, having hit the debugging wall himself, posted the
code to the list and asked help. Leo tracked down the bug in Parrot and
fixed
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
newsub and implicit registers
[...] ops [...] that IMCC needed to
track. Leo has a patch in his tree that deals with the issue.
Sorry, my posting seems to have been misleading. The register tracking
code is in the CVS
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:21, Piers Cawley wrote;
Freeze/thaw data format and PBC
Leo Tötsch is working on the data serialization/deserialization
(aka Freeze/Thaw) system discussed over the last few weeks. He
wondered if there were any plans for the frozen image data
format. Leo's
Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:21, Piers Cawley wrote;
Freeze/thaw data format and PBC
Leo Tötsch is working on the data serialization/deserialization
Cool. How are hooks in place for tools like Pixie and Tangram when
these objects are being stored?
Piers Cawley wrote:
newsub and implicit registers
[...] ops [...] that IMCC needed to
track. Leo has a patch in his tree that deals with the issue.
Sorry, my posting seems to have been misleading. The register tracking
code is in the CVS tree.
Thanks again for your summaries,
leo
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot Calling Convention Confusion
... -- I thought they were exactly the same as an unprototyped call,
but you invoke the return continuation (P1) instead of P0, the other
registers are set up
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Parrot Calling Convention Confusion
... -- I thought they were exactly the same as an unprototyped call,
but you invoke the return continuation (P1) instead of P0, the other
registers are set up exactly as if you were making an unprototyped
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Object Freezing
[ ... ]
... The upshot is that we're doing it Dan's way; Glorious Leader
continues to trump Pumpking Patchmonster.
As this is a summary, abbove sentence is a summary as well. The reality
is more complex. The final implementation
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
Brent isn't adult? Gosh!
BRENT_D = 36/2.04739336492890995260663507109 = appr. 17 ages and 296 days
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
l - A full year has passed, hasn't it? - eo
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
Thanks.
Dan Sugalski:
# On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
# Piers Cawley:
# # Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way
could
# there
# # be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by
reading
# # through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists
: This week's summary (off-list-to-protect the names of the
young and
old)
# Yes, Happy Birthday Piers, that makes you twice as old as Brent! :)
You're about a month early to say that, but... *snickers*
(Eighteen on October 20th. w00t.)
--Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Perl and Parrot hacker
Yeah, and my
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond?
Impressive.
Simon
Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote:
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C =
2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D
They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond?
Impressive.
I don't. But I do know that the
Piers Cawley:
# Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could
there
# be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
# through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists and
# boiling them down into a summary?
Happy birthday, Piers.
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
Piers Cawley:
# Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could
there
# be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
# through a bunch of old messages in a couple of mailing lists and
# boiling them
PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: This week's summary
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Brent Dax wrote:
Piers Cawley:
# Welcome to this week's Perl 6 Summary. And what better way could
there
# be of spending the morning of your 36th birthday than by reading
# through a bunch of old
Piers Cawley wrote in perl.perl6.internals :
I want a Ponie!
I promise that, as development of Ponie (the port of Perl 5 to Parrot)
accelerates you'll see a summary of Ponie activity in this summary as
well.
In fact I imagined I was more or less going to do this, based on
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:32:00PM -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Will I really be forced to reimplement the whole subrecursive frobnizer
for tied magic ?
Almost certainly, I expect.
--
There's something wrong with our bloody ships today, Chatfield.
Admiral Beatty at the Battle of
Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
I want a Ponie!
I promise that, as development of Ponie (the port of Perl 5 to Parrot)
accelerates you'll see a summary of Ponie activity in this summary as
well. However, almost all the traffic on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 5:42 AM
Subject: This Week's Summary
Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20030810
Another week, another summary. How predictable is
Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Piers Cawley wrote:
Matt Fowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley wrote:
I want a Ponie!
I promise that, as development of Ponie (the port of Perl 5 to Parrot)
accelerates you'll see a summary of Ponie activity in
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why new_pad *INT*?
Michal Wallace asked for some clarification about new_pad, the opcode
that creates a new lexical scratchpad. He thought that, 9 times out of
10 you would want to create a new pad at the next lower depth from the
Dave Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:32:00PM -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
Will I really be forced to reimplement the whole subrecursive frobnizer
for tied magic ?
Almost certainly, I expect.
There's nothing to stop us *both* summarizing the parrot-dev
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
