Re: This week's summary (off-list-to-protect the names of the young and old)

2003-09-16 Thread Vladimir Lipskiy
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C = 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D Brent isn't adult? Gosh! BRENT_D = 36/2.04739336492890995260663507109 = appr. 17 ages and 296 days

RE: This week's summary (off-list-to-protect the names of the young and old)

2003-09-15 Thread Melvin Smith
Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C = 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D -Melvin Brent Dax [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/15/2003 11:43 AM To: Melvin Smith/ATLANTA/Contr/[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: This

RE: This week's summary (off-list-to-protect the names of the young and old)

2003-09-15 Thread Simon Glover
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote: Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C = 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond? Impressive. Simon

Re: This week's summary (off-list-to-protect the names of the young and old)

2003-09-15 Thread Piers Cawley
Simon Glover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Melvin Smith wrote: Dan spoke too soon, we have just confirmed that PIERS_C = 2.04739336492890995260663507109 * BRENT_D They both know their time of birth to the nearest nanosecond? Impressive. I don't. But I do know that the