At 01:11 PM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> > From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> > >Ok, I understand that this hasn't been implemented due to
> > the believe
> > >that it's a dangerous feature (Programming Perl). But would
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 1:12 PM
> To: 'Dan Sugalski'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using stringified address
>
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Sugalski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 9:59 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Using stringified address
>
>
> At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> >Ok,
At 11:09 AM 1/1/2002 -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
>Ok, I understand that this hasn't been implemented due to the believe
>that it's a dangerous feature (Programming Perl). But would it be ok to
>enable/disable it with a specific pragma?
Might happen. Larry's talked about it on and off, and if you
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:58:48AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> I still can't understand why is this such a bad thing, especially if you
> can check for it with pragmas. I guess I've been reading all this stuff
> about how dangerous and bad this is, with no explanation. I mean a lot
> of things
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ily
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:54 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ily
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 11:38:16AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> Not sure, I'll have to take a look at the module, but would it be
> usefull to include in the standard distro
Please, no. That definitely counts as "more than enough rope".
> included. I was thinking more of a pragma type usage, so
se of something I'm trying to accomplish:-)
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon Cozens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2002 8:18 AM
> To: Sterin, Ilya
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Using stringified address
>
>
> On
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 04:00:22AM -0800, Sterin, Ilya wrote:
> Using a scalar (string) with an address to another variable and be able
> to dereference it. This proves very usefull when pasing dynamic strings
> with addresses embeded in them. I don't believe this is available in
> current perl
Ok, I understand that this hasn't been implemented due to the believe
that it's a dangerous feature (Programming Perl). But would it be ok to
enable/disable it with a specific pragma?
Ilya
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterin, Ilya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 01,
11 matches
Mail list logo
