Simon Cozens:
> I didn't object. :) But I do think that patching the current interpreter
> is slightly futile
I mean assembler, but I hope you guessed that. :)
--
"Which you then convert to gold, non-perishable food, firearms, good liquor &
a secluded hideaway in the last of the internet offic
Melvin Smith:
> Agreed, hence my mail last night asking for objections.
I didn't object. :) But I do think that patching the current interpreter
is slightly futile, since I've got about three-quarters of the new one done
and it's a damned sight simpler.
Simon
--
[Bastille Linux] Of course, if
At 02:24 PM 3/10/2002 -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
># Single line changes to add a size argument to a the constructors.
>
>Small diff, big changes. A one-line diff in the right place can
>increase or decrease size or speed a thousandfold. This alters the
Agreed, however I hope any of us with commit
Melvin Smith:
# At 02:02 PM 3/10/2002 -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
# >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# ># cvsuser 02/03/10 13:15:50
# >#
# ># Modified:lib/Parrot Assembler.pm
# ># Log:
# ># Minor patch to the assembler for the new_p_ic_ic opcode to
# ># work same as new_p_ic (looks up a named class
At 02:02 PM 3/10/2002 -0800, Brent Dax wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
># cvsuser 02/03/10 13:15:50
>#
># Modified:lib/Parrot Assembler.pm
># Log:
># Minor patch to the assembler for the new_p_ic_ic opcode to
># work same as new_p_ic (looks up a named class).
>Did Dan, Simon, or someone
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# cvsuser 02/03/10 13:15:50
#
# Modified:lib/Parrot Assembler.pm
# Log:
# Minor patch to the assembler for the new_p_ic_ic opcode to
# work same as new_p_ic (looks up a named class).
#
# Also added small hack for .sub directive (which simply translates
# to a
