Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See attached the patch, plus the new asm.s file.
Doesn't run, segfaults on even mops.pasm - please check.
I can't reproduce that here; parrot -j works for me
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 23, 2004, at 3:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
We were allocating the volatile float registers first (or, only)--so
Cset_s_sc was blowing away an N-register, even with only one in use.
That's why I was surprised there weren't more failures.
Yes. As
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See attached the patch, plus the new asm.s file.
Doesn't run, segfaults on even mops.pasm - please check.
JEff
leo
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, that was the core of the issue. There's no free lunch--if we use
the nonvolatile registers, we need to preserve/restore them in
begin/end, but if we use the volatile registers, we need to preserve
them across function calls (incl. normal op calls).
On Oct 23, 2004, at 4:20 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See attached the patch, plus the new asm.s file.
Doesn't run, segfaults on even mops.pasm - please check.
I can't reproduce that here; parrot -j works for me with
examples/{benchmarks,assembly}/mops.pasm, and
On Oct 23, 2004, at 3:42 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, that was the core of the issue. There's no free lunch--if we use
the nonvolatile registers, we need to preserve/restore them in
begin/end, but if we use the volatile registers, we need to preserve
them
