Simon --
> > If you think I'm missing the point/boat in some way, by all means slide
> > me a clue.
>
> Hell no. The less work needs doing before 0.0.3 the better. :) Jako's
> just fine, but as you're the language designer
Cool! I'm a language designer! :) Although, I'm not really sure Jako is
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:44:22PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> If you think I'm missing the point/boat in some way, by all means slide
> me a clue.
Hell no. The less work needs doing before 0.0.3 the better. :) Jako's
just fine, but as you're the language designer I wanted to make sure
you we
Simon --
> > I'm in M^3 (Major Marketing Mode) right now
>
> Using emacs doesn't necessarily help matters.
I'm a vi partisan myself. I'm intrigued by emacs, and I've even
tried it, but I just haven't been able to justify learning another
operating system when all I need is an editor :) Seriousl
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:11:04PM -0500, Gregor N. Purdy wrote:
> I'm in M^3 (Major Marketing Mode) right now
Using emacs doesn't necessarily help matters.
> I've been following the list, but I'm not clear on the status of
> PerlIntArray PMCs. In/out, ready/hold-off?
Waiting for 0.0.4.
--
Wh
Simon --
> After I've done PerlUndef and the assembler patch, it would be type="big">really really great if we had some interesting
> examples using these PMCs; similarly, I'd like to know if the
> maintainers of the little languages (Hey, Gregor, where did you
> disappear to?)
I haven't fallen
Hurm.
I realized the other day that I hadn't done -anything- with tcl since my
last post, which has to have been months ago.
Given sufficient documentation, I could be motivated to improve the
status of this interpreter (and throw it into cvs somewhere).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> While I'd
At 12:01 PM 12/3/2001 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>While I'd like to use the current PMCs for Scheme atoms, they don't have
>the correct behavior for use in Scheme.
What're they missing?
Dan
--"it's like this"-
While I'd like to use the current PMCs for Scheme atoms, they don't have the correct
behavior for use in Scheme. In any case, after I get finished with a reasonably clean
PerlArray implementation (hopefully this evening) I'll be developing SchemeAtom and
SchemeList types to support Scheme devel
