From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 01:10:02 -0800
On Saturday 01 March 2008 20:23:08 Bob Rogers wrote:
>r26053 produces the segfault shown below, which looks like another
> case of trying to compare the HLL name "lisp" to something corrupted
> from the
On Saturday 01 March 2008 20:23:08 Bob Rogers wrote:
>r26053 produces the segfault shown below, which looks like another
> case of trying to compare the HLL name "lisp" to something corrupted
> from the HLL name-to-ID hash. (FWIW, it was still broken as of r26165.)
>
>However, if I revert
