On 7/5/06, Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:33 PM, chromatic wrote:
> On Monday 03 July 2006 09:01, Jonathan T. Rockway wrote:
>
>> That said, I would be interested. I'm still trying to page all the
>> perl6/parrot grammars (PGE, TGE, etc.) into my brain, so any
>> ad
On Jul 3, 2006, at 6:33 PM, chromatic wrote:
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:01, Jonathan T. Rockway wrote:
That said, I would be interested. I'm still trying to page all the
perl6/parrot grammars (PGE, TGE, etc.) into my brain, so any
additional
examples would helpful, interesting, and fun. Fo
On 7/3/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Diagnostic information *is* unreliable in TAP.
> Do not parse it.
It is now being discarded.
Don't discard it, just pass it straight through.
Consider the use case of wanting
I would say that even if nobody else is interested, if you're
interested, do it :)
That said, I would be interested. I'm still trying to page all the
perl6/parrot grammars (PGE, TGE, etc.) into my brain, so any additional
examples would helpful, interesting, and fun. For me, anyway :)
Rega
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:01, Jonathan T. Rockway wrote:
> That said, I would be interested. I'm still trying to page all the
> perl6/parrot grammars (PGE, TGE, etc.) into my brain, so any additional
> examples would helpful, interesting, and fun. For me, anyway :)
Jerry Gay just wrote a PGE TA
- Original Message
From: Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Diagnostic information *is* unreliable in TAP.
> Do not parse it.
It is now being discarded.
> Test::Harness does not allow a leading space. There's no reason to start.
OK. Thanks.
> Test::Harness handles directives ca
On 7/3/06, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently, the way that Test::Harness::TAP reads, I should properly discard
anything which is not a plan, test or diagnostic output. However, test failure
output and programmer supplied diagnostic output need to be disambiguated or
diagnostic informa
- Original Message
> From: chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Monday 03 July 2006 09:12, Ovid wrote:
> > I am tempted, but there are some problems with parsing TAP output as it
> > currently stands. I can write a grammar for it, but the grammar can easily
> > produce some output which d
On Jul 3, 2006, at 5:52 AM, Ovid wrote:
Hi all,
I would still like to be in a position to write a grammar for TAP,
but I've heard no answers to my questions. Should I assume that a
formal grammar is not wanted/desired at this point?
No no no, please do. I will be glad to put it in TAP
On Monday 03 July 2006 09:12, Ovid wrote:
> I am tempted, but there are some problems with parsing TAP output as it
> currently stands. I can write a grammar for it, but the grammar can easily
> produce some output which doesn't make sense.
Isn't this the syntactic/semantic problem common to all
- Original Message
From: Jonathan T. Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I would say that even if nobody else is interested, if you're
> interested, do it :)
I am tempted, but there are some problems with parsing TAP output as it
currently stands. I can write a grammar for it, but the gramm
11 matches
Mail list logo
