On Tue, Aug 22, 2000 at 06:31:14PM +0200, Markus Peter wrote:
> Well - after all it's just an implementation detail... My question is what's
> wrong to only supply the information on perl ports where systems do not
> have zoneinfo ? But I've to admit that I don't really care as long as we
> fina
--On 22.08.2000 12:18 Uhr -0400 Chris Nandor wrote:
> Yes, well you did say, "In my opinion there's no reason for localtime or
> gmtime to be in the core at all." I guess that doesn't necessarily mean
> it should be removed in your opinion, but it sure seems like it.
As I said - my mail was eas
At 17:44 +0200 2000.08.22, Markus Peter wrote:
>--On 22.08.2000 11:18 Uhr -0400 Chris Nandor wrote:
>
>> If there's a good reason to remove localtime(), then fine. But please say
>> something more than "web applications don't need it."
>
>Well, I did not really talk about removing it - I know abo
--On 22.08.2000 11:18 Uhr -0400 Chris Nandor wrote:
> If there's a good reason to remove localtime(), then fine. But please say
> something more than "web applications don't need it."
Well, I did not really talk about removing it - I know about the backwards
compatibility issues. I know my mail
At 6:43 +0200 2000.08.22, Markus Peter wrote:
>In my opinion there's no reason for localtime or gmtime to be in the
>core at all.
I can think of two outstanding reasons for them to be in the core: because
they've already been there, and there is no reason to take it out.
>I especially want to f
