At 9:00 AM +0200 4/29/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Log:
It's whether JIT_CAPABLE is set, not exists
Ah yes. Thanks. It's too simple to mix these two cases. There were some
approaches to unify that along with unique PARROT_ prefixes.
Yeah. Not a big deal,
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Log:
> It's whether JIT_CAPABLE is set, not exists
Ah yes. Thanks. It's too simple to mix these two cases. There were some
approaches to unify that along with unique PARROT_ prefixes.
We'd need a more consistent naming of such defines and at best just
