Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Fernando Santagata
Thank you! On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:47 PM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > > On 29 May 2017, at 17:33, Fernando Santagata > wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote: > > > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22,

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 29 May 2017, at 17:33, Fernando Santagata > wrote: > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote: > > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata > > wrote: > > > > /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Fernando Santagata
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Brent Laabs wrote: > > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata >> wrote: >> > >> > /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented! >> > > Believe it or not, this is documented in nqp/docs/ops.markdown in the >

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Brent Laabs
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > Perhaps Zoffix is willing to take a PR for an IO::Path.nlinks method as > part of the IO grant. > > I think I'd rather have IO::Path.inode myself. Although, I did roll my own version in IO::Path::More. > > On 29

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
Perhaps Zoffix is willing to take a PR for an IO::Path.nlinks method as part of the IO grant. > On 29 May 2017, at 11:22, Fernando Santagata > wrote: > > /me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented! > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Brent Laabs

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Fernando Santagata
/me sighs: NQP is still so poorly documented! On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Brent Laabs wrote: > This works without a module on Rakudo: > > use nqp; > my $path = "foo".IO; > my $hardlink-count = nqp::stat($path.absolute, nqp::const::STAT_PLATFORM_ > NLINKS); > > > > > On

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Brent Laabs
This works without a module on Rakudo: use nqp; my $path = "foo".IO; my $hardlink-count = nqp::stat($path.absolute, nqp::const::STAT_PLATFORM_NLINKS); On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:54 AM, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote: > > On 29 May 2017, at 10:42, Fernando Santagata

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
> On 29 May 2017, at 10:42, Fernando Santagata > wrote: > > The three files are already hard-linked, no need for soft links. > > BTW, is there a way to detect hard links in Perl6? > Perl5 "stat" operator returns an array whose fourth element is the number of > hard

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-29 Thread Fernando Santagata
The three files are already hard-linked, no need for soft links. BTW, is there a way to detect hard links in Perl6? Perl5 "stat" operator returns an array whose fourth element is the number of hard links of a file, but I don't see anything like that in the Perl6 docs. On Sun, May 28, 2017 at

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-28 Thread Parrot Raiser
If they are really identical, might it be an idea to use symbolic links for 2 of them? That would reduce the code to be stored, maintained, and transmitted, and make it blatantly obvious if different versions are required. On 5/28/17, Nelo Onyiah wrote: > I presume that's

Re: zef, zef-j, zef-m

2017-05-28 Thread Nelo Onyiah
I presume that's j for JVM and m for MoarVM. On 28 May 2017 2:42 pm, "Gabor Szabo" wrote: > Hi, > > I've just noticed that in /Applications/Rakudo/share/perl6/site/bin/ I > have 3 copies > of every script. One with a -j and one with a -m at the end just as for > zef: > > zef