On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:20:19 +0100, Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:34 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
If frames aren't adjacent, normal argument copying can be done anyway.
This would seem to require the same types of runtime
Bill Coffman wrote:
In that case, I'll focus on the register renaming, live-range
analysis, etc.
Great.
In light of this, I think I'll send in my patch, in case it is
helpful. The problem is that some routine outside of imc_reg_alloc()
is sending in conflicting register preallocation.
Yep.
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:10:20 -0800
From: Bill Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And spilling?
Well, I'm proposing a variable-sized register frame. With very little
additions we could run with more then 32 registers per kind (there are a
few bitmasks currently that would need adaptions,
At 10:51 AM -0800 11/12/04, Michel Pelletier wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 04:10:20 -0800
From: Bill Coffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And spilling?
Well, I'm proposing a variable-sized register frame. With very little
additions we could run with more then 32 registers per kind (there are a
From other threads:
Now we are placing arguments or return values in registers according
to PDD03 and the other end has immediately access to the placed
values, because the register file is in the interpreter.
With the indirect addressing of the register frame, this argument
passing is
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH it doesn't really matter, if the context structure is in the
frame too. We'd just need to skip that gap. REG_INT(64) or I64 is as
valid as I0 or I4, as long as it's assured, that it's exactly
addressing the incoming argument area of the called
On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:34 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH it doesn't really matter, if the context structure is in the
frame too. We'd just need to skip that gap. REG_INT(64) or I64 is as
valid as I0 or I4, as long as it's assured, that it's exactly
addressing
Jeff Clites [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 8, 2004, at 1:34 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
If frames aren't adjacent, normal argument copying can be done anyway.
This would seem to require the same types of runtime checks that you
are objecting to below,
Not runtime. The register allocator
