At 8:52 AM +0100 3/17/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
How many "save"s does it take to be to be slower than one "push"?
This really depends on the architecture, the running core and so on.
But Dan estimated a cutoff value of 3, this test program indicates a
cutoff of 2:
For
Steve Fink wrote:
>
> On Mar-17, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
> >
> > The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and
> > I've only go windows to test on...
> >
> > If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than
> > doing a single "push".
> >
> > If I do 1 "save", th
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and I've
only go windows to test on...
If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than doing a
single "push".
If I do 1 "save", this will (hopefully) be faster than 1 "push".
Yep slightly.
Ho
On Mar-17, Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>
> The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and I've
> only go windows to test on...
>
> If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than doing a
> single "push".
>
> If I do 1 "save", this will (hopefully) be faster than 1
The answer to this question varies from platform to platform, and I've
only go windows to test on...
If I do 32 "save"s in a row, this will certainly be slower than doing a
single "push".
If I do 1 "save", this will (hopefully) be faster than 1 "push".
How many "save"s does it take to be to be
