Re: The Void type

2005-05-18 Thread TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
and is not confusing because we have : no Void type. Nice, without Void we don't need the double headed pseudo type lattice needed if we were to distinguish subs that return no usefull---that is Any---value from the ones that return no value at all. Hrm. So if I have a sub that does nothing: sub Foo

The Void type

2005-05-13 Thread Autrijus Tang
have : no Void type. Nice, without Void we don't need the double headed pseudo type lattice needed if we were to distinguish subs that return no usefull---that is Any---value from the ones that return no value at all. Hrm. So if I have a sub that does nothing: sub Foo

Re: The Void type

2005-05-13 Thread Rod Adams
and is not confusing because we have : no Void type. Nice, without Void we don't need the double headed pseudo type lattice needed if we were to distinguish subs that return no usefull---that is Any---value from the ones that return no value at all. Hrm. So if I have a sub that does nothing