Ilya Martynov wrote:
There is a small typo in comment for second test case:
Thanks, fixed.
Plus another test and checks that I3 is really 11.
leo
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> On Monday 22 March 2004 13:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
>> And P3 := overflow_args ?
>> P0 := the_sub ??
>> P1 := return_continuation ?
>> S0 := method_name ?
> Sounds okay. Maybe its better to either alias return_continuation to the
> regis
> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LT> Ilya Martynov wrote:
>> Prints 'P3 is not NULL'
LT> Yep, some minutes ago I've fixed it. Thanks for the test, I've added
LT> it plus another one to CVS.
There is a small typo in comment for second test case:
Index: imcc/t/syn/pcc.t
=
Hi,
On Monday 22 March 2004 13:54, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
> Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> First a note: P3 is now cleared, if P15 is reached. So havin 11 args can
> be distinguished from having more then 11 arguments.
>
> > Leo, is it easy to alias them as argc[ISPN]?
>
> Yes. It's the
> "JR" == Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JR> Hi,
JR> On Monday 22 March 2004 10:44, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>> 12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>> pmc parameters).
>>
> "LT" == Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LT> Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>> 12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>> pmc parameters).
>> According callin
Jens Rieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
First a note: P3 is now cleared, if P15 is reached. So havin 11 args can
be distinguished from having more then 11 arguments.
> Leo, is it easy to alias them as argc[ISPN]?
Yes. It's the same as aliasing C to P2. If we can agree on the
variable names, this i
Ilya Martynov wrote:
Prints 'P3 is not NULL'
Yep, some minutes ago I've fixed it. Thanks for the test, I've added it
plus another one to CVS.
leo
At 12:50 PM +0100 3/22/04, Jens Rieks wrote:
> ops/set.ops has setp_ind op which allows to write to register by its
number but it seems there is no op to read register by its number.
I had the same problem, too.
That needs fixing. If you want to throw together a patch, by all
means go for it.
--
Hi,
On Monday 22 March 2004 10:44, Ilya Martynov wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>pmc parameters).
>
> According calling conventions (pdd03) first 11 params end up
Ilya Martynov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
>12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
>pmc parameters).
> According calling conventions (pdd03) first 11 params end up in P5-P15
> regi
Hello all,
1) First question is how to tell if variadic function recieved 11 or
12 or more params (for simplicity let's suppose that we use only
pmc parameters).
According calling conventions (pdd03) first 11 params end up in P5-P15
registers and leftover goes into array in P3. The problem
12 matches
Mail list logo
