On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
implementation.
Sadly, this was not considered when hq9+ was developed, so it's not
actually part of the language. Maybe someone should develop and
extended
)
Subject: We *need* this op! :-)
Accompanying patch adds the fortytwo op to Parrot, so the following
PASM becomes legal:
fortytwo I0
print I0
print \n
end
Example:
$ ../parrot test42.pasm
42
Sorry, could not resist. :-)
++Jos.es
--
ek is so lug
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Jos Visser wrote:
Accompanying patch adds the fortytwo op to Parrot, so the following
PASM becomes legal:
fortytwo I0
print I0
print \n
end
Example:
$ ../parrot test42.pasm
42
Sorry, could not resist. :-)
Simon Glover wrote:
Why not just use a macro?
# .macro fortytwo (A)
#set .A, 42
# .endm
#
# .fortytwo(I0)
# print I0
# print \n
# end
Simon
Shouldn't be The Answer a builtin?
Kay
Accompanying patch adds the fortytwo op to Parrot, so the following
PASM becomes legal:
fortytwo I0
print I0
print \n
end
Example:
$ ../parrot test42.pasm
42
Sorry, could not resist. :-)
++Jos.es
--
ek is so lug jy vlieg deur my
sonder jou is ek sonder
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
implementation.
Sadly, this was not considered when hq9+ was developed, so it's not
actually
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
This is really a language feature; you should add it to the hq9+
implementation.
Sadly,
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003, Jos Visser wrote:
Accompanying patch adds the fortytwo op to Parrot, so the following
PASM becomes legal:
fortytwo I0
print I0
print \n
end
Example:
$ ../parrot test42.pasm
42
Why not just use a macro?
# .macro fortytwo (A)
#set
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 01:51PM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 12:33:03PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:20:46AM -0400, David H. Adler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:57:11PM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
This is really a language
Nicholas Clark wrote:
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:21:11PM +0200, Jos Visser wrote:
fortytwo I0
Shouldn't it be the what_do_you_get_if_you_multiply_six_by_nine op?
Shouldn't it be the
what_do_you_get_if_you_multiply_six_by_nine_then_subtract_twelve op?
Nicholas Clark
SCNR2, leo
Jos Visser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Accompanying patch adds the fortytwo op to Parrot, so the following
PASM becomes legal:
fortytwo I0
Pah, we need my dynpmc patch:
load_pmc foo, P0
new P0, .Foo
set I0, P0
print I0
print \n
end
42
Shouldn't it be the
what_do_you_get_if_you_multiply_six_by_nine_then_subtract_twelve op?
No, it shouldn't. Meditate about it again and you will be enlightened.
Hint: Base 13.
Greetings,
Christian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.web42.com/crenz/ - http://www.web42.com/
The worst attitude of
12 matches
Mail list logo
