Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
save $P1
restore $P2
[ ... ]
$P2 = $P1
or even removed entirely, rewriting everything after the "" to refer
to $P1 instead of $P2. Does imcc do anything like this?
Not yet. But it will do, at least for Parrot calling conventions, where
register moves should
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
[snip]
> If someone's code emits something like:
>
>save $P1
>restore $P2
>
> Then IMCC should be able to optimize that to:
>
>$P = $P1
>$P2 = $P
Actually, that (sometimes) should be able to be changed to:
$P2 = $P1
noop
or:
noop
Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
> Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>> Joseph Ryan wrote:
>>> Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
[snip]
Hmm... If imcc is smart enough, (or perhaps I should say, when the
flow control is simple/clear enough) it should be able to see when a
value is pushed onto the stack, and late
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Joseph Ryan wrote:
> Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>
> >[...] the problem isn't that python uses *more* registers than
> >, but rather, that it doesn't use registers at all. Instead,
> >it uses a stack. So, for example, python's add instruction might get
> >translated into the f
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>
>Joseph Ryan wrote:
>
>>Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>>
>>>K Stol wrote:
>>>
The register stuff, I presume, is register allocation and the like?
When targeting IMCC, you can use an infinite amount of registers. Just
keep a counter in the code generator, each time
On 28 Jul 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Klass-jan wrote:
> > Maybe it's not possible to have the eval instruction right away, in the new
> > Python->IMC code generator. As long as this command is not used in the code
> > for this new code generator, this can just be skipped, and it may be
> > impleme
> - Original Message -
> From: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:46 AM
> Subject: Re: approaching py
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:46 AM
Subject: Re: approaching python
> Klass-jan wrote:
&
Klass-jan wrote:
> Maybe it's not possible to have the eval instruction right away, in the new
> Python->IMC code generator. As long as this command is not used in the code
> for this new code generator, this can just be skipped, and it may be
> implemented in IMC by hand, and inserted into the new
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Benjamin Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: approaching python
> Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
>
> >K Sto
> Nono, the problem isn't that python uses *more* registers than
> , but rather, that it doesn't use registers at all. Instead,
> it uses a stack. So, for example, python's add instruction might get
Nobody said Python used more registers than . Michal
just worried if it would be problematic to d
Benjamin Goldberg wrote:
K Stol wrote:
The register stuff, I presume, is register allocation and the like? When
targeting IMCC, you can use an infinite amount of registers. Just keep a
counter in the code generator, each time a new register is needed, just
increment the counter and add a "${S|N|I
K Stol wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:01 PM
> Subje
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: approaching python
>
> On 24 Jul
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin Goldberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: approaching python
> K Stol wrote:
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Michal Wallac
K Stol wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:48 PM
> Subject: approaching python
>
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've bee
Luke Palmer wrote:
>Klass-Jan Stol writes:
>
>>>The thing is, I don't have a lot of experience when it comes to
>>>compilers, but I do know a whole lot about python. :) If this
>>>approach makes sense, is there someone with IMCC experience who'd
>>>be willing to do some virtual pair programming wi
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Joseph F. Ryan wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the Python bytecode spec (to be a little more
> accurate, I'm completely clueless about it), but perhaps something
> similar can be done? Also, another thing to consider is that it
> might be easier to translate python bytecode d
On 24 Jul 2003, Luke Palmer wrote:
> Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > module, right? I don't know Python, and I've a little experience
> > with IMC, but it seems to me only a new code generator module should
...[snip]
> Well... sortof. It's definitely going to take writing a whole new
> code generato
to link with python, we should probably write our own parser.[1]
Just use Perl 6 to write it :). Ooops... looks like a chicken-and-egg
problem...
Greetings,
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Luke Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 2:22 AM
Subject: Re: approaching python
> Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > > The thin
Klass-Jan Stol writes:
> > The thing is, I don't have a lot of experience when it comes to
> > compilers, but I do know a whole lot about python. :) If this
> > approach makes sense, is there someone with IMCC experience who'd
> > be willing to do some virtual pair programming with me and spike
> >
- Original Message -
From: "Michal Wallace" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 4:48 PM
Subject: approaching python
>
> Hey all,
>
> I've been thinking about the "compiling python to
> parrot" c
Hey all,
I've been thinking about the "compiling python to
parrot" concept. Right now it looks like the
approach is to start from scratch, but I'm
wondering if it might make more sense to
leverage python itself, at least for now?
Python has a compiler module (written in python
and standard wi
24 matches
Mail list logo
