On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Nicholas Clark wrote:
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
closure.pmc, line 21: warning: a cast does not yield an lvalue
I think that the appended patch will work around the problem, by doing
the case on the pointer (which is an RVALUE) and then deferencing.
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-#define PMC_sub(pmc) ((parrot_sub_t)((pmc)-cache.pmc_val))
+#define PMC_sub(pmc) (*((parrot_sub_t *)((pmc)-cache.pmc_val)))
This seems to work. Thanks for the patch.
(the tcc tinderbox seems to be missing a make
Nicholas Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-#define PMC_sub(pmc) ((parrot_sub_t)((pmc)-cache.pmc_val))
+#define PMC_sub(pmc) (*((parrot_sub_t *)((pmc)-cache.pmc_val)))
This seems to work. Thanks for the patch.
(the tcc tinderbox seems to be missing a make realclean/Configure or
such though)
leo
On a fresh checkout today, my Solaris C compiler issued the following
warnings. If memory serves, there are other compilers that don't
like lvalue casts as well.
closure.pmc, line 21: warning: a cast does not yield an lvalue
closure.pmc, line 48: warning: a cast does not yield an lvalue
On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Andy Dougherty wrote:
On a fresh checkout today, my Solaris C compiler issued the following
warnings. If memory serves, there are other compilers that don't
like lvalue casts as well.
lcc tcc to name two; only with these, it's an error, not just a
warning.
Simon
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
closure.pmc, line 21: warning: a cast does not yield an lvalue
tcc fails totally. Its of cource me to blame :-)
What is the official way here:
- don't do that, its really forbidden (why)
- create another macro acround that?
The lvalue usage isn't to
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:05:33PM +0200, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
closure.pmc, line 21: warning: a cast does not yield an lvalue
tcc fails totally. Its of cource me to blame :-)
What is the official way here:
- don't do that, its really forbidden
