Re: making v6 test suite its own distro

2006-07-11 Thread Gaal Yahas
On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: I believe that the current Test.pm already qualifies as a baby-Perl implementation, as overall its functionality is quite simple, and it uses very little of the language (especially since its use of junctions was removed a few

Re: making v6 test suite its own distro

2006-07-11 Thread jerry gay
On 7/11/06, Gaal Yahas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 03:55:25PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: I believe that the current Test.pm already qualifies as a baby-Perl implementation, as overall its functionality is quite simple, and it uses very little of the language (especially

Re: making v6 test suite its own distro

2006-07-10 Thread Gaal Yahas
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:47:17AM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: As briefly discussed on #perl6 ... As briefly replied there before being jethandled... I propose that we make like Sun and its Java VM validation suite, and start distributing the Perl 6 test suite as its own distribution on CPAN

Re: making v6 test suite its own distro

2006-07-10 Thread Darren Duncan
At 6:53 PM +0300 7/10/06, Gaal Yahas wrote: On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:47:17AM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: As briefly discussed on #perl6 ... As briefly replied there before being jethandled... As further discussed there ... Perhaps we need a baby-Perl Test::Simple for new

making v6 test suite its own distro

2006-07-08 Thread Darren Duncan
As briefly discussed on #perl6 ... Now that we are fulfilling an intention for Perl 6 to have multiple fully decoupled implementations that are distinct from its spec, Pugs and v6.pm being the largest short term examples, I propose that we make like Sun and its Java VM validation suite, and