Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> s/has appeared/has NOT appeared/
>
> Richard Hainsworth wrote:
>> I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
>> reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
>>
That's because perl6-all is a meta list,
Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:20:56PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
So again: how can bugs be reported?
See the "Reporting bugs"
On Sun, 4 Jan 2009, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:20:56PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
So again: how can bugs be reported?
See the "Repo
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 05:20:56PM +0300, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
> reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
>
> So again: how can bugs be reported?
See the "Reporting bugs" section of RE
On 2009 Jan 4, at 9:20, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
So again: how can bugs be reported?
A quick google of "rakudo bug" points to rakudo...@perl.org
--
brandon
s/has appeared/has NOT appeared/
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
I posted an email to per6-all asking about how one should go about
reporting bugs. That message has appeared on the list.
So again: how can bugs be reported?
There was a suggestion by PM for people to try out perl6 on some real
software, and the scripting completion tasks were suggested.
So
I wonder if rt.cpan.org is broken. I'm trying to close ticket #2658 for
Log::Procmail, but I can't tell rt when it's been fixed, since it show
only version 0.01 to 0.05, when CPAN already holds 0.08 (0.06 and 0.07
have come and gone, since I try to tidy up behind me).
I believe that at one point, J
Le mercredi 05 mai 2004 à 17:16, Andy Lester écrivait:
> On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:44:58AM -0200, Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I guess this answer also means that there is no script similar to
> > perlbug that would report bugs about CPAN modules ?
> > Wouldn't this help increasing t
On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:44:58AM -0200, Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I guess this answer also means that there is no script similar to
> perlbug that would report bugs about CPAN modules ?
> Wouldn't this help increasing the use or RT ?
Not everyone uses RT. Many authors ignore it,
On Wed, 5 May 2004, Andy Lester wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:40:32PM -0200, Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Is there some command line tool that can be used to report bugs to RT ?
>
> Sure, it's called "sendmail".
>
> If you want to send a bug on Test::Harness, send an email to
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 11:40:32PM -0200, Gabor Szabo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is there some command line tool that can be used to report bugs to RT ?
Sure, it's called "sendmail".
If you want to send a bug on Test::Harness, send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL P
Is there some command line tool that can be used to report bugs to RT ?
Something that after I saw that make test fails (or even if it just
prints warnings) I can type some command line magic and will submit
a bug report with all the relevant information including the output
of make test.
Simila
13 matches
Mail list logo
