Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-14 Thread Dino Morelli
On Thu, 12 May 2005, Autrijus Tang wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:09:00PM -0400, Dino Morelli wrote: Feel free to correct 'no_plan'. I'll happily apply any and all patches to the tests, and those with commit privs are welcome to directly modify the t/p6rules/*.t files at any time.

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-12 Thread Autrijus Tang
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:09:00PM -0400, Dino Morelli wrote: Feel free to correct 'no_plan'. I'll happily apply any and all patches to the tests, and those with commit privs are welcome to directly modify the t/p6rules/*.t files at any time. Speak of the devil -- I started working on

small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread Uwe Voelker
Hello, I fixed a small typo in PBC_COMPAT. Btw. the tests in t/p6rules/*.t have 'no_plan'. Should this be changed to reflect the correct number of tests? I have this patch ready, but I'm too shy to post :-) Bye, Uwe Index: PBC_COMPAT

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread chromatic
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:16 +0200, Uwe Voelker wrote: I fixed a small typo in PBC_COMPAT. Thanks, applied. Btw. the tests in t/p6rules/*.t have 'no_plan'. Should this be changed to reflect the correct number of tests? I have this patch ready, but I'm too shy to post :-) That seems

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread Bernhard Schmalhofer
chromatic schrieb: On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 18:16 +0200, Uwe Voelker wrote: I fixed a small typo in PBC_COMPAT. Thanks, applied. From reading PBC_COMPAT I gathered that PBC_COMPAT should only be changed, when the PBC syntax has changed. # The text in this file is also the base

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread Uwe Voelker
That seems reasonable to me. Please do. Here it is (together with a gentle reminder at the end of the .t file :-) But feel free to leave this line out. Uwe Index: t/p6rules/anchors.t === --- t/p6rules/anchors.t (revision 8065) +++

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread Patrick R. Michaud
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Uwe Voelker wrote: Hello, I fixed a small typo in PBC_COMPAT. Btw. the tests in t/p6rules/*.t have 'no_plan'. Should this be changed to reflect the correct number of tests? I have this patch ready, but I'm too shy to post :-) Feel free

Re: small typo in PBC_COMPAT

2005-05-11 Thread Dino Morelli
On Wed, 11 May 2005, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 06:16:27PM +0200, Uwe Voelker wrote: Btw. the tests in t/p6rules/*.t have 'no_plan'. Should this be changed to reflect the correct number of tests? I have this patch ready, but I'm too shy to post :-) Feel free to correct