Nick Glencross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
#define PARROT_HASH_ALIGNED_FUNCPTR 0
Actually, where it uses this in mmd.c is actually an #ifndef which means
that really the above line should be commented out.
The various HPUX-related changed didn't make it into the
On Saturday 04 June 2005 20:29, Clement Cherlin wrote:
I actually have Linux installed on this machine, but for reasons which
I'm not going to get into here I use Win98 for day-to-day computing. I
therefore took it as a challenge to get Parrot to build with crufty ol'
command.com.
I have a
Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Nick Glencross (via RT) wrote:
+if ($^O ne 'MSWin32') {
I'd much more prefer one of:
a) if $^O eq 'hpux'
b) fix the copy to preserve perms
Anyway, as hpux is still broken in several other places, I'll drop a
note in PLATFORMS and not apply the patch now.
Hi,
From the Perl6 and Parrot Essentials:
- 8 -
sub flat_hash ($first, $second) {
say first: $first;
say sec. : $second;
}
my %hash = (first = 1, second = 2);
flat_hash(*%hash);
- 8 -
It says, that No compatible subroutine found. I've modyfied the
subroutine:
-
Hi,
No ideas?
Bye,
Andras
I'm working on a web templating system, and I'm wondering how should I
use rules?
I have these defs:
rule elem {
\ wts \: ([a..z]+) \/ \
}
rule block {
\ wts \: ([a..z]+)\(.*?)\ \/ wts \: $1 \
}
I would like to execute subroutines during the
On 6/5/05, BÁRTHÁZI András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried it on the feather.perl6.nl machine, with pugs. Is it the
right behaviour?
Caller-side splatted arguments aren't yet implemented in Pugs. As far
as I know, the specced behaviour is still correct.
Stuart
I'll take a shot at it since no one else seems to want to. :-)
On 6/3/05, BÁRTHÁZI András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I catch the matched elem name, and block content? I'm guessing
that hypotetical variables can be the solution, but it says, that those
variables should have been defined,
Hi,
I'll take a shot at it since no one else seems to want to. :-)
Hope this is helpful. Corrections are welcome from anyone who spots
any mistakes.
Thanks, it helped me!
More questions. ;) It seems to me, that the following constructs not
yet(?) implemented in Pugs. Is it true?
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
Some tweaks will be needed to the Configure tests (not too many), but
I'd just like to summarise what I believe to be the 'big
Nick Glencross wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
My hacked HP-UX build now passes most tests. Wohooo!
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed
GlennH wrote:
Hello folks,
I read about the Phalanx project on the yahoo Agile Testing group and
thought I'd sign up the mailing list and skulk in the background.
Don't just skulk. Enlist!
http://qa.perl.org/phalanx/
http://phalanx.kwiki.org/
jimk
As follows are what I did:
# follow the instruction of parrot/README, I download the
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/globalization/icu/downloads.jsp, and
success to install the ICU library.
# perl Configure.pl
make
make install
# now parrot is running. but it's not in my PATH. should I 'ln
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005 17:05:13 +0100, Nick Glencross
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
Some tweaks will be needed to the Configure
I have made available version 0.2.1 of the amber for
parrot scripting language. This is a language being designed
specifically for parrot. The syntax and semantics of amber are largely
inspired by Eiffel although there's a good deal of ruby in there too
(especially the anonymous agents which work
Nick Glencross wrote:
Folks,
I hope that not too many of you are getting fed up with me going on
about HP-UX. I'm nearly there with having it working with manually
hacked Makefiles etc.
I've nearly finished making my updates. I need some help on one aspect
though...
extend.o and
Hi,
two quick questions:
Are multi submethods allowed?
my $x = undef;
my $y = $x.some_method;
# $y now contains an unthrown exception object, saying that undef
# doesn't .can(some_method), right?
say $y; # Only now it dies, correct?
This is important if you have a sub which may
Nick Glencross wrote:
Nick Glencross wrote:
extend.o and nci_test.o need to be built with $(CC_SHARED) in addition
to the normal flags. What's the most straightforward way of doing this?
I've had a couple of experiments with config/gen/makefiles/root.in, but
don't know what the 'right
On Sun, 05 Jun 2005, fayland wrote:
# exprot PUGS_EMBED='parrot'
export PARROT_PATH='/usr/local/parrot-0.2.0'
perl Makefile.PL
make
# make failed, after tons of successful Compilings, it returns
Try the parrot build tree, rather than where parrot is installed.
--
Greg Matheson, Taiwan
18 matches
Mail list logo
