Re: [perl #126684] [BUG] Reverse on a Range returns a List, not a Range

Ok, maybe what it should return would be some sort of ReversedRange object? I guess this could be considered a feature request, but, I'd like is for (^5).reverse.reverse and similar to be able to produce a Range. -Original Message- From: Moritz Lenz via RT Sent: Friday, November 20,

[perl #126711] Possible bug in `try` when dealing with `await`

# New Ticket Created by Zoffix Znet # Please include the string: [perl #126711] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126711 > See this conversation and results from camelia for details:

[perl #126700] [JVM] calling index with negative start position on string does not return Nil

After Rakudo commit negative start positions are disallowed: $ perl6 -e 'say index("xxy", "y", -1).perl' Failure.new(exception => X::OutOfRange.new(what => "Position in index", got => -1, range => "0..3", comment => Any), backtrace => Backtrace.new) Tested in S32-str/index.t and

[perl #125784] Negative overflow in Str.index $startpos

It looks like the overflow still happens. (Expected result is different nowadays, since negative start positions are disallowed (see https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/fa3ce116e3). See also http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2015-11-21#i_11577908 $ perl6-m -e 'say index("xxy", "y",

[perl #126708] Grammar.parse does not ignore unknown named args

# New Ticket Created by "Brian S. Julin" # Please include the string: [perl #126708] # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. # https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=126708 > This is a regression since star09 which make Grammar more tedious to subclass.