Please create a Raku community channel

2021-03-12 Thread Richard Hainsworth
This is a request to the Raku Coordinating Council that was elected at the end of last year. Please name a channel where community wide plans or announcements are made. Or may be establish one. I found out yesterday by the intervention of a regular participant in the community that a new

Re: Newsgroups

2021-03-12 Thread William Michels via perl6-users
I think the priority should be keeping the community together and gradually migrating to a more appropriately-named list, possibly running dual lists for a while make sure we don't lose anyone in the transition. Best Regards, Bill. W. Michels, Ph.D. On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 12:36 PM Will Coleda

Re: [sf-perl] The SF Perl Raku Study Group, 03/14 at 1pm PDT

2021-03-12 Thread Richard Hainsworth
Jo, I think you are something! Existentially and exemplary! The quotations you find are very interesting. TJ, I wonder whether there is some misunderstanding? Richard On 12/03/2021 19:09, yary wrote: Or is that a Zen critique ... I think therefore i am not...? On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 11:21

Re: [sf-perl] The SF Perl Raku Study Group, 03/14 at 1pm PDT

2021-03-12 Thread yary
Or is that a Zen critique ... I think therefore i am not...? On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 11:21 AM Joseph Brenner wrote: > You'll need to expand on that a bit, I don't get the complaint. > > Do pretentious quotations bug you? > > > On 3/12/21, Tiejun Li wrote: > > Joseph, > > You think you are

Re: [sf-perl] The SF Perl Raku Study Group, 03/14 at 1pm PDT

2021-03-12 Thread Joseph Brenner
You'll need to expand on that a bit, I don't get the complaint. Do pretentious quotations bug you? On 3/12/21, Tiejun Li wrote: > Joseph, > You think you are something. You are not. You are nothing. > TJ > > On Friday, March 12, 2021, 3:17:03 AM GMT+8, Joseph Brenner > wrote: > > Donald

Re: "rule" declarator: Different results for 'unadorned' match vs unnamed/named captures? (in re Grammars...).

2021-03-12 Thread Ralph Mellor
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 8:53 PM William Michels wrote: > > I think there's something going on with the examples below, as I'm > seeing different results when comparing a basic "rule" match vs either > unnamed or named "rule" captures. All your examples are correct according to my current