Re: coercion

2022-02-11 Thread Marcel Timmerman
On 11-02-2022 15:58, Daniel Sockwell wrote: The question now is that I can't find anything about COERCE in the documentation. Yeah, COERCE definitely should be documented but just hasn't been yet. There's a raku/doc issue about needing to add it (https://github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3807) but

Re: coercion

2022-02-11 Thread Daniel Sockwell
> The question now is that I can't find anything about COERCE in the > documentation. Yeah, COERCE definitely should be documented but just hasn't been yet. There's a raku/doc issue about needing to add it (https://github.com/Raku/doc/issues/3807) but unfortunately none of us has done so yet

Re: coercion

2022-02-11 Thread Elizabeth Mattijsen
It is being tested in Roast, so I'd say it's not really that experimental anymore :-) > On 11 Feb 2022, at 15:20, Marcel Timmerman wrote: > > Hi, > > I stumbled over a discussion between Raku developers on > "Raku/proplem-solving" issue 227 "Coercion reconsidered and unified" and I > saw

coercion

2022-02-11 Thread Marcel Timmerman
Hi, I stumbled over a discussion between Raku developers on "Raku/proplem-solving" issue 227 "Coercion reconsidered and unified" and I saw something interesting about coercion. Without much knowledge I started to experiment with a method called COERCE(). This ended successful and can now