Re: Off-list discussions, was Re: imcc hack for perl6 regexes

On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Mark Koopman wrote: > > I wonder how many interested observers of this list there are like > > myself. I only wish I had the time & experience/skill/knowledge to > > contribute. > > > > Keep up the good work. Lurker honk, agreement. :) R.

Re: Parrot: maximizing the audience

On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Markus Laire wrote: > > * the name "perl6-internals" is really too restrictive (but this point has > > already been discussed last week). > Would it be possible to rename "perl6-internals" now to something > better like "parrot-internals"? +1. > There probably are some

RE: autoconf for parrot, but not quite what you think.

> -Original Message- > From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:53 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: autoconf for parrot, but not quite what you think. > > That will mainly involve changing markers in the source files that > currently look like '${f

RE: [PATCHES] ord(i,s|sc(,i|ic)?) operator committed, fixed bug in concat()

Did you forget the string.c checkin? Parrot cvs failing, don't see string_ord anywhere, and cvs logs don't show a string.c update. R. > -Original Message- > From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:46 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PATCHES] ord