On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 02:16:28PM -0700, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
On Thu Jun 10 21:11:42 2010, rir...@comcast.net wrote:
I think it is a bug that these differ
rule TOP { ^ tok }
rule TOP {^ tok }
It actually conforms the current spec. Each consecutive run of
whitespace is replaced
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 09:51:22PM -0500, Bruce Gray wrote:
> > On May 29, 2021, at 5:57 PM, rir wrote:
> >rule cmp_expression {
> >|
> >|
> >| ...
> >}
> I am not at all clear on what you are asking, so if no
value_expression exist but are not well
defined, nor known by me.
rir
zle for me that "UnknownBareId KnownClassId"
is accepted has the start of a valid statement. How would such
a statement be completed?
Thanks,
rir
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:48:07PM +0100, Elizabeth Mattijsen wrote:
> $ raku -e 'class samesame { hello samesame, { say "Wosup?" } }'
>
ting any of:
infix
infix stopper
postfix
Why is this a special case instead of a common undeclared error? The
second 'samesame' could be 'Instant' and do the same.
I'm not seeing how to continue from the ⏏ to make a statement.
rir
', and 'modifier loop' are phrases that don't
exist on docs.raku.org.
I think I interpreted "before the expression" poorly.
Thanks,
rir
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:18:11PM +, Gianni Ceccarelli wrote:
> On 2021-02-24 rir wrote:
> > It is just an odd puzzle for me that "Unk
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:32:25AM -0700, Sean McAfee wrote:
> In Perl 5 ...
> 1 == (my ($script) = $page->find('//script'))
> or die "Other than exactly one script element found";
> Can a similar expression that avoids an intermediate array variable be
> written in Perl 6?
This
Is it possible to to delegate plain or overridden operators? If so,
what does the syntax look like?
Rob
CURI?
rob
REPL says:
> Date.new("2024-02-29").later( :1year);
2025-02-28
Is the following some standard?
05:23, rir wrote:
> >
> >
> > REPL says:
> >> Date.new("2024-02-29").later( :1year);
> >2025-02-28
> >
> > Is the following some standard?
>
> I'm not sure...
>
> Basically when moving by month / year, it just basically moves
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 08:40:07AM -0700, William Michels via perl6-users wrote:
> > \
> {}
> > \\
> {}
> > \\\
> {}
> Curiously, I seem to create an object in my REPL environment when I enter
> either a single-, double-, or triple-backslash. ...
Your backslash destroys the newline so the
Can you give, or point to, a definition of 'full-blown macros'?
Rob
Hi all,
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 08:44:02PM -0700, William Michels via perl6-users wrote:
> I'm assuming the `%` is the anonymous state variable (associative)?
> https://docs.raku.org/language/variables#The_%_variable
Thanks, Bill, that is a significant bit (Ha, I'll keep that to punish
This is sharing a 'What?!!' moment and some aftermath with the
hope of some reduction of ignorance.
This is from some code I found:
say my %h = % = %(:a(1)); # OUTPUT: «{a => 1}»
All whitespace after the identifier is optional--not changing the
assignment.
Reduced further:
Hi,
Sorry, my previous message got away from me a little to soon.
I'll stand by it without the last partial sentence,
and, more important, the addition of a greeting and
some good will.
Thanks,
Rob
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:54:11PM -0400, rir wrote:
>
> This is sharing a 'What?!!'
Richard,
That is a nice summary of some differences among various Callables.
Rob
On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:34:01PM +0100, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
> Hi Todd,
>
> Long time no see.
>
> Re your 'keeper'. There is a reason why things are called the way they are
> in Raku (aka Perl6). BEGIN is
Are there any Raku modules for extracting meta-data from
JPEG files? I have looked but not found.
At this point, I just want to extract dates to re-timestamp
the files. Later, I might use the fix in the pictures to
map to personally defined places.
Rob
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:55:05PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users wrote:
> Fedora 36
> rakudo-pkg-2022.7.0-03.x86_64
>
>
> > use NativeCall
>
> > $j =6; $k = CArray[uint8].new(0xFF xx $j ); print $j ~ "\n";
> Cannot find method 'qast' on object of type NQPMu
>
>
> REPL does not like the
:54PM +, Ralph Mellor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 11:11 PM rir wrote:
> >
> > Deprecating 'undefine' is just making something easy more difficult.
>
> I see a problem with `undefine`:
>
> ```
> my @bar;
> say @bar.defined, @bar.DEFINITE; # TrueTrue
&g
2023 at 01:38:22PM +0100, Polgár Márton wrote:
> On 2023. 03. 14. 4:42, rir wrote:
> > undefine seen at:
> >, line 1
> > Will be removed with release v6.e!
> > Please use another way: assign a Nil; for Arrays/Hashes, assign Empty
> > or
undefine seen at:
, line 1
Will be removed with release v6.e!
Please use another way: assign a Nil; for Arrays/Hashes, assign Empty or ()
instead.
Will that deprecation require a conditional and two assignments
for mixed data?
[$a, @a, $b, %c, $c, ].map: { .};
[$a, @a, $b,
rse
> this is all just my opinion and this feels like something reasonably simple
> to achieve; simple enough that I can take up on it when the time comes.
> Objections are welcome, except the kind that refers to the breaking nature
> and legacy reasons.
>
> On 2023. 03. 18.
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:42:45PM +, Ralph Mellor wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:49 AM rir wrote:
> >
> > I did, and do, recognize the validity of the problem of 'undefine' not
> > not aligning with '.defined'.
>
> But do you understand the problem
how containers might be
implemented, but I think education about the current state is a good path.
That could be more docs, and also callables which may have little point
but as educational demonstrations.
Rob
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 04:58:30PM -0400, rir wrote:
> Marton, I am not sure of y
25 matches
Mail list logo